R v Kafataris
Case
•
[2025] NSWDC 404
•09 October 2025
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Kafataris [2025] NSWDC 404
[2025] NSWDC 404
09 October 2025
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of R v Kafataris involved the defendant, Kafataris, who was found guilty of grooming a child under 16 for unlawful sexual activity and of sexually touching a young person between 16 and 18 who was under special care. The matter was heard in the County Court of Victoria. The prosecution brought forth charges against Kafataris for his actions towards two young individuals, seeking a sentence reflective of the severity and nature of the offences.
The legal issues before the court included the appropriate sentencing principles to apply to the offences of grooming a child under 16 for unlawful sexual activity and sexual touching of a young person between 16 and 18 under special care. The court needed to weigh the gravity of the offences, the impact on the victims, and the need for general and specific deterrence. The defence argued for a non-custodial sentence, citing personal circumstances and potential rehabilitation prospects. The prosecution urged for a custodial sentence to adequately reflect the seriousness of the crimes and to protect the community.
In its judgment, the court acknowledged the heinous nature of the offences and the profound impact on the victims. It noted the vulnerability of the individuals involved, particularly considering the special care status of one of the victims. The court determined that a full-time custodial sentence was necessary to uphold the principles of denunciation and deterrence. The judge considered the totality of the circumstances and concluded that the only appropriate sentence was one of imprisonment. The court delivered its sentence in line with these considerations, ensuring that the punishment matched the gravity of the crimes committed.
The legal issues before the court included the appropriate sentencing principles to apply to the offences of grooming a child under 16 for unlawful sexual activity and sexual touching of a young person between 16 and 18 under special care. The court needed to weigh the gravity of the offences, the impact on the victims, and the need for general and specific deterrence. The defence argued for a non-custodial sentence, citing personal circumstances and potential rehabilitation prospects. The prosecution urged for a custodial sentence to adequately reflect the seriousness of the crimes and to protect the community.
In its judgment, the court acknowledged the heinous nature of the offences and the profound impact on the victims. It noted the vulnerability of the individuals involved, particularly considering the special care status of one of the victims. The court determined that a full-time custodial sentence was necessary to uphold the principles of denunciation and deterrence. The judge considered the totality of the circumstances and concluded that the only appropriate sentence was one of imprisonment. The court delivered its sentence in line with these considerations, ensuring that the punishment matched the gravity of the crimes committed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Sentencing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Kafataris [2025] NSWDC 404
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
14
Statutory Material Cited
2
CT v R
[2017] NSWCCA 15
Gale v The Queen
[2021] NSWCCA 16
Kearsley v R
[2017] NSWCCA 28