R v Kafataris

Case

[2025] NSWDC 404

09 October 2025


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v Kafataris [2025] NSWDC 404 [2025] NSWDC 404 09 October 2025

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Kafataris involved the defendant, Kafataris, who was found guilty of grooming a child under 16 for unlawful sexual activity and of sexually touching a young person between 16 and 18 who was under special care. The matter was heard in the County Court of Victoria. The prosecution brought forth charges against Kafataris for his actions towards two young individuals, seeking a sentence reflective of the severity and nature of the offences.

The legal issues before the court included the appropriate sentencing principles to apply to the offences of grooming a child under 16 for unlawful sexual activity and sexual touching of a young person between 16 and 18 under special care. The court needed to weigh the gravity of the offences, the impact on the victims, and the need for general and specific deterrence. The defence argued for a non-custodial sentence, citing personal circumstances and potential rehabilitation prospects. The prosecution urged for a custodial sentence to adequately reflect the seriousness of the crimes and to protect the community.

In its judgment, the court acknowledged the heinous nature of the offences and the profound impact on the victims. It noted the vulnerability of the individuals involved, particularly considering the special care status of one of the victims. The court determined that a full-time custodial sentence was necessary to uphold the principles of denunciation and deterrence. The judge considered the totality of the circumstances and concluded that the only appropriate sentence was one of imprisonment. The court delivered its sentence in line with these considerations, ensuring that the punishment matched the gravity of the crimes committed.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Criminal Liability

  • Sentencing

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

14

Statutory Material Cited

2

CT v R [2017] NSWCCA 15
Gale v The Queen [2021] NSWCCA 16
Kearsley v R [2017] NSWCCA 28