R v Jones

Case [2024] NSWDC 355


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Jones [2024] NSWDC 355
Hearing dates: 27/6/24
Date of orders: 27/6/24
Decision date: 27 June 2024
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years 9 months with a NPP of 2 years 2 months (29/7/23-28/9/25).

I find special circumstances.

Taking into account a 25 percent discount for the pleas, the indicative sentences are:

Seq 1 KTP manufacture large comm qty – 3 years 6 months with NPP 2 years (Form 1 taken into account).

Seq 6 Not store firearms safely – 4 months

Seq 7 Assault police – 3 months

Seq 14 Possess prohibited firearm – 15 months

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence – Knowingly take part in manufacture of large commercial quantity of methylamphetamine - Firearms

Legislation Cited:

Crimes(SentencingProcedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Lloyd v R [2022] NSWCCA 18

Porter v R [2019] NSWCCA 117

R v Mahmud [2010] NSWCCA 219

Toole v R [2014] NSWCCA 318

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
Danny Jones - Offender
Representation: Ms Romelingh for Crown
Mr Bhutani for Offender
File Number(s): 22/326151

remarks on sentence

  1. The offender Mr Danny Jones is for sentence in relation to a number of offences, the most serious being sequence 1 which is an offence of knowingly take part in the manufacture of a large commercial quantity of prohibited drug, namely methamphetamine. The maximum penalty for that offence is life imprisonment, and a standard non-parole period of fifteen years is specified. Furthermore, in relation to that offence he asks that I take into account on a Form 1 document, three other offences being two offences of possessing unregistered firearms and a third offence of failing to notify of firearm safekeeping arrangements and I will take those matters into account.

  2. In addition there are three other offences that are the subject of section 166 certificate, on which I am asked to also impose sentence. Those being the sequence 6 offence of failing to take reasonable precautions to ensure firearms were safely kept, which has a maximum penalty of twelve months imprisonment, the sequence 7 offence of assaulting a police officer in the execution of his duty, which on indictment has a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment but in the Local Court is subject to two years maximum and the sequence 14 offence which is one of possessing a prohibited firearm which on indictment carries a 14 year maximum penalty and attracts potentially a four year standard non-parole period, however when dealt with in the Local Court is subject to a two year maximum. Of course in dealing with the matters on the 166 certificate I am aware that those matters are subject to the jurisdictional limit of two years by which I am also bound.

  3. The maximum penalties and where applicable, which is essentially in relation to the sequence 1 offence, the standard non-parole period are of course important guide posts in the sentencing…

Continue reading R v Jones

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Jones [2024] NSWDC 355
Case
[2024] NSWDC 355
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellant, Jones, was convicted of participating in the manufacture of a large commercial quantity of methylamphetamine, failing to store firearms safely, assaulting a police officer, and possessing a prohibited firearm. The case was heard in the relevant court, which rendered its decision on the appropriate sentence for Jones. The central legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate aggregate term of imprisonment for Jones, considering the various offences and the principles of sentencing.

The court examined the seriousness of each offence and the circumstances in which they were committed. Jones' participation in the manufacture of a large commercial quantity of methylamphetamine was deemed particularly egregious, warranting a significant sentence. Additionally, the failure to store firearms safely, the assault on a police officer, and the possession of a prohibited firearm were all considered in the sentencing process. The court also acknowledged the mitigating factors, such as Jones' plea of guilty, which resulted in a 25 percent discount on the indicative sentences. The court had to balance these factors to arrive at an appropriate aggregate sentence.

After considering the various factors, the court sentenced Jones to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years and 9 months. A non-parole period of 2 years and 2 months was set, with the sentence to commence on 29 July 2023 and end on 28 September 2025. The court found special circumstances, which contributed to the final sentencing decision. The indicative sentences for each offence were also taken into account, with a 25 percent discount applied due to the pleas of guilty.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years 9 months with a NPP of 2 years 2 months (29/7/23-28/9/25).

I find special circumstances.

Taking into account a 25 percent discount for the pleas, the indicative sentences are:

Seq 1 KTP manufacture large comm qty – 3 years 6 months with NPP 2 years (Form 1 taken into account).

Seq 6 Not store firearms safely – 4 months

Seq 7 Assault police – 3 months

Seq 14 Possess prohibited firearm – 15 months

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.