District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v John Barber [2016] NSWDC 68 Hearing dates: 27 April 2016 Decision date: 06 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Mahony SC DCJ Decision: Full time custodial sentence
For orders see [48]Catchwords: Sentencing; aggregate sentence; aggravated break, enter and steal and other offences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1985
Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901
Road Transport Act 2013Cases Cited: JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297
McIntosh v R [2015] NSWCCA 184
Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610
R v Cahyadi (2007) 168 ACrimR 41
R v Caldwell [2016] NSWCCA 55
R v Rae [2009] NSWCCA 9
Zreika v R [2012] NSWCCA 44Category: Sentence Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
John Barber (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
L Hanshaw (Crown)
S Bouveng (Offender)
File Number(s): 15/359741 Publication restriction: Nil
REMARKS ON SENTENCE
-
The offender was committed for sentence on 24 February 2016 from Wagga Wagga Local Court. He had pleaded guilty to three offences, namely:
Take and drive conveyance pursuant to s 154A(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900. This offence carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment.
Stalk/intimidate pursuant to s 13(1) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (“C(DPV)A”). This offence carries a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment.
Aggravated break, enter and steal pursuant to s 112(2) of the Crimes Act 1900. This offence carries a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment with a standard non-parole period of 5 years.
-
In addition, the offender had pleaded guilty to the following matters on a s 166 Certificate:
Drive manner dangerous pursuant to s 117(2) of the Road Transport Act 2013. The maximum penalty is 9 months imprisonment; automatic disqualification for 3 years, with minimum disqualification of 12 months.
Drive whilst disqualified (2nd subsequent offence) pursuant to s 54(1)(a) of the Road Transport Act 2013. Maximum penalty 2 years imprisonment; automatic disqualification of 2 years.
Enter enclosed lands (x 2) pursuant to s 4(1)(b) of the Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901. Maximum penalty 5 penalty units.
Possess prohibited drug pursuant to s 10(1) of the Drug (Misuse and Trafficking) Act 1985. Maximum penalty of 2 years imprisonment.
Background to the offending
Offence 1; Take and drive conveyance without consent of owner
-
On 10 November 2015, the offender was given permission to borrow a motor vehicle registered number ZFW 501 from the owner, on proviso that he return the vehicle the next morning. He did not return the vehicle despite several requests to do so, and eventually the car was reported to the police as stolen on 3 December 2015. On 6 December 2015, the offender drove the vehicle from Wollongong to Wagga Wagga. At the time of this offence the accused was a disqualified driver, having been disqualified at Port Kembla Local Court on 26 August 2014 until 5 March 2022.
Offence 2;…
Continue reading R v John Barber
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v John Barber [2016] NSWDC 68
- Case
- [2016] NSWDC 68
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the seriousness of the offences, the defendant's criminal history, and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation. It was noted that the offences were not only serious in their individual nature but also demonstrated a pattern of criminal behaviour. The court placed particular emphasis on the aggravated nature of the break, enter, and steal offence, which involved significant breach of security and potential harm to victims. The defendant's previous convictions were taken into account, reflecting a persistent pattern of criminal activity. After careful deliberation, the court concluded that an aggregate sentence was necessary to adequately address the cumulative impact of the defendant's offending and to serve the interests of justice.
In its reasoning, the court balanced the need for punishment with the potential for rehabilitation. The final determination was that a full-time custodial sentence was appropriate. The court ordered the defendant to serve a specified term in prison, with the exact details of the sentence outlined in the court's written reasons. The court's decision aimed to reflect the gravity of the offences, provide deterrence, and contribute to the defendant's rehabilitation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full time custodial sentence
For orders see [48]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.