District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v JD [2011] NSWDC 256 Hearing dates: 12 December 2011 Decision date: 21 December 2011 Before: Letherbarrow SC DCJ Decision: Sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of six years and an effective nonparole period of four years
Catchwords: CRIME - Sentencing - agrravated indecent assault - aggravated sexual intercourse without consent - hardship - health of parents - whether exceptional circumstances - prior good character of little relevance in matters involving sexual offences against children - regard to sentencing patterns at time of offences Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900, s61M(2), s61J(1)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s44(2)Cases Cited: R v Edwards (1996) A Crim R 510
R v Hart [1999] NSWCA 2004
R v Alla [2004] NSWCCA 378
R v Wood [2005] NSWCCA 233
R v Lo, R v Ouang [2004] NSWCCA 382
R v Capper [2000] NSWCCA 63
R v Tobias [2001] NSWCCA 522
Le v R [2006] NSWCCA 136
R v Rhule unreported, 25 July 1995 NSWCCA
R v Muldoon unreported, 13 December 1990, NSWCCA
R v H (1983) 3 A Crim R 53
R v JCW [2000] NSWCCA 209
MJL v R [2007] NSWCCA 261
R v MJR (2002) 54 NSWLR 368
R v Moon (2000) 117 A Crim R 497 at 511
Fisher v R (1989) 40 A Crim R 442
Georgopolous v R [2010] NSWCCA 246
Sivill v R [2009] NSWCCA 286
Khoury v R [2011] NSWCCA 118
Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 357
Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610
Bonwick v R [2010] NSWCCA 177Category: Sentence Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions - Crown
JD - OffenderRepresentation: Director of Public Prosecutions
Higgins
Director of Public Prosecutions
Nikola Velcic & Associates
File Number(s): 2010/392776 Publication restriction: Non-publication order as to names of complainant and accused
Judgment
HIS HONOUR: On 1 November 2010 the offender was found guilty at his trial before a jury on all four counts in the indictment. All such counts relate to offences committed against his daughter, the complainant, between January 2002 and May 2006 when she was aged between five and ten years and the offender was aged between forty-one and forty-six years.
The first, second and fourth counts are offences of aggravated indecent assault and fall under s 61M(2) of the Crimes Act, 1900, for which the maximum penalty is imprisonment for ten years. It is agreed that there is no standard nonparole period relating to any of these offences, as whilst they were introduced during the relevant period averred to in the indictment, the evidence does not establish when during such periods the offences were committed.
The circumstance of aggravation for counts 1 and 2 was that the complainant was under ten years of age at the time, namely five or six years. The circumstance of aggravation for count 4 was the complainant was under ten years at the time, namely seven, eight or nine years.
The third count is a offence of aggravated sexual…
Continue reading R v JD
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v JD [2011] NSWDC 256
- Case
- [2011] NSWDC 256
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether there were exceptional circumstances warranting a reduced sentence and the relevance of the defendant's prior good character in sentencing. The court also considered the sentencing patterns at the time of the offences. The defence argued for a lesser sentence due to the hardship it would cause JD's parents, who were in poor health, and the mitigating factor of JD's previously unblemished record.
The court acknowledged the hardship that a custodial sentence would cause JD's parents but noted that prior good character held little relevance in cases involving sexual offences against children. The court took into account the severity of the offences and the sentencing patterns at the time of the offences. It concluded that, despite the exceptional circumstances, a significant term of imprisonment was necessary to appropriately reflect the gravity of the crimes committed. The defendant was sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of six years, with an effective nonparole period of four years.
Orders
Orders of the court
Sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of six years and an effective nonparole period of four years
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.