R v Irving

Case

[2001] QCA 472

2 November 2001


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
R v Irving [2001] QCA 472 [2001] QCA 472 2 November 2001

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Irving, appealed against his sentence of nine years’ imprisonment, imposed following his conviction for armed robbery. The Court of Appeal heard the appeal and was required to decide whether the sentence was manifestly excessive. Additionally, the Court considered the relevance of section 161C of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) in the context of the applicant’s sentence. The Court held that the sentence was not manifestly excessive, and the appeal against sentence was dismissed. The Court also found that section 161C of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) had no relevant application to the applicant’s sentence. The Court declared that section 161C of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) has no relevance to any sentence or sentences of imprisonment that the applicant is now serving or liable to serve.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Criminal Liability

  • Limitation Periods

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
R v Cole [2016] QCA 307

Cases Citing This Decision

22

R v Lacey and Lacey [2010] QDC 344
R v Cole [2016] QCA 307
R v Richardson [2010] QCA 216
Cases Cited

3

Statutory Material Cited

2

DF v The Queen [2006] NTCCA 13
DF v The Queen [2006] NTCCA 13
R v Shillingsworth [2001] QCA 172