R v Irving
Case
•
[2001] QCA 472
•2 November 2001
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
R v Irving [2001] QCA 472
[2001] QCA 472
2 November 2001
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Irving, appealed against his sentence of nine years’ imprisonment, imposed following his conviction for armed robbery. The Court of Appeal heard the appeal and was required to decide whether the sentence was manifestly excessive. Additionally, the Court considered the relevance of section 161C of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) in the context of the applicant’s sentence. The Court held that the sentence was not manifestly excessive, and the appeal against sentence was dismissed. The Court also found that section 161C of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) had no relevant application to the applicant’s sentence. The Court declared that section 161C of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) has no relevance to any sentence or sentences of imprisonment that the applicant is now serving or liable to serve.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Criminal Liability
-
Limitation Periods
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
R v Irving [2001] QCA 472
Most Recent Citation
R v Cole [2016] QCA 307
Cases Citing This Decision
22
R v Lacey and Lacey
[2010] QDC 344
R v Cole
[2016] QCA 307
R v Richardson
[2010] QCA 216
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
2
DF v The Queen
[2006] NTCCA 13
DF v The Queen
[2006] NTCCA 13
R v Shillingsworth
[2001] QCA 172