SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Case Title: | R v Hodge |
Citation: | [2019] ACTSC 15 |
Hearing Date: | 31 January 2019 |
DecisionDate: | 31 January 2019 |
Before: | Murrell CJ |
Decision: | Offender convicted of all offences and sentenced to a total of two years’ imprisonment, nonparole period ending on 18 October 2020. Offender disqualified from driving for 24 months. |
Catchwords: | CRIMINAL LAW – JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Judgment and Punishment – Sentence – Arson – Dishonestly take motor vehicle without consent – Fail to stop motor vehicle when requested by police |
Legislation Cited: | Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT) ss 7, 36, 66 Criminal Code2002 (ACT) ss 318(1), s 404(1) Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (ACT) s 5C |
Cases Cited: | |
Parties: | The Queen (Crown) Bradley James Hodge (Offender) |
Representation: | Counsel Mr B Nguigi (Crown) Mr A Doig (Offender) |
| Solicitors ACT Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Darryl Perkins & Co (Offender) | |
File Number: | SCC 287 of 2018 |
Murrell CJ
Introduction
In November 2018, the offender pleaded guilty to the following offences:
(a)Count 1—On 5 October 2018, he dishonestly took a Lancer motor vehicle without consent, contrary to s 318(1) of the Criminal Code2002 (ACT) (Criminal Code). The offence carries a maximum penalty of five years’ imprisonment and/or a fine.
(b)Count 2—On 15 October 2018, he dishonestly took a Holden motor vehicle without consent, contrary to s 318(1) of the Criminal Code.
(c)Count 3—On 15 October 2018, he failed to stop a motor vehicle when requested to do so by police, contrary to s 5C of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 (ACT) (Road Transport Act). A first offence, carries a maximum penalty of 12 months’ imprisonment and/or a fine. A mandatory minimum license disqualification period of three months applies.
(d)Count 4—On 16 October 2018, he intentionally caused damage by fire to a Lancer motor vehicle, contrary to s 404(1) of the Criminal Code. The offence carries a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment and/or a fine.
(e)Count 5—On 18 October 2018, he failed to stop a motor vehicle when requested to do so by police, contrary to s 5C of the Road Transport Act. A repeat offence, the penalty is three years’ imprisonment and/or a fine. A mandatory minimum license disqualification period of 12 months applies.
The pleas were entered in the Magistrates Court prior to the preparation of a brief of evidence.
Having regard to the timing of the pleas, it is appropriate that the offender receive a discount of approximately 25 per cent on the sentences that would otherwise have been imposed. I accept that, apart from the offence of 18 October 2018, the Crown case was a strong one. However, the usual discount recognising the high utilitarian value of the pleas should nevertheless apply. I deal with the offence of 18 October 2018 below at [10].
Continue reading R v Hodge
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Hodge [2019] ACTSC 15
- Case
- [2019] ACTSC 15
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues central to the case involved the appropriate sentencing principles to be applied in relation to each of the offences, and how these should be balanced against each other. The court had to consider the seriousness of the offences, the defendant's criminal history, and the circumstances surrounding each offence. Additionally, the court needed to address the driving disqualification period and its implications. The defence argued for a lesser sentence, citing mitigating factors, while the prosecution urged a stringent penalty to reflect the gravity of the crimes.
In delivering its judgment, the court meticulously evaluated the nature and circumstances of each offence. It found that the defendant's actions demonstrated a high level of recklessness and disregard for public safety. The court took into account the cumulative effect of the offences and the need for deterrence. The court also considered the defendant's previous record and personal circumstances. Ultimately, the court determined that a total sentence of two years’ imprisonment, with a nonparole period ending on 18 October 2020, was appropriate. The court further ordered that the defendant be disqualified from driving for 24 months.
The final orders of the court were that the defendant, Hodge, be convicted of all charges and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment, with a nonparole period ending on 18 October 2020. Additionally, the court disqualified Hodge from driving for 24 months. This decision underscores the court's commitment to ensuring justice is served and public safety is upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
Offender convicted of all offences and sentenced to a total of two years’ imprisonment, nonparole period ending on 18 October 2020.
Offender disqualified from driving for 24 months.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.