District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hitchen [2020] NSWDC 753 Hearing dates: 9/10/20, 12/10/20 Date of orders: 12/10/20 Decision date: 12 October 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bourke SC DCJ Decision: Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 6 years with a NPP of 3 years 10 months (11/10/18-10/8/22). I find special circumstances.
Indicative sentences:
Proceeding 008 Knowingly take part in supply comm qty – 5 years 10 months with NPP 3 years 9 months (Form 1 taken into account).
Proceeding 003 Possess unauthorised firearm – 6 months.
Seq 6 Supply large commercial qty – withdrawn and dismissed.
Catchwords: Crime – Sentence – Parity – Knowingly take part in supply of commercial quantity methylamphetamine – Supply large commercial quantity - Possess unauthorised firearm
Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Firearms Act 1996
Cases Cited: Weininger v The Queen [2003] 212 CLR 629
Category: Sentence Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
Geoffrey Hitchen - OffenderRepresentation: Mr G Ellis for Crown
Mr M Smith for Offender
File Number(s): 2018/311257
sentence
-
Mr Geoffrey Hitchen comes before the Court for sentence on two offences which are as follows. Firstly, knowingly take part in the supply of a prohibited drug, being not less than the commercial quantity of methylamphetamine. The maximum penalty for that offence is 20 years’ imprisonment and a standard non parole period of ten years applies. In addition, in sentencing him for that offence he asks that I take into account on a Form 1 an offence of knowingly deal with proceeds of crime, which itself carries a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment. The second offence for which he is to be sentenced is one of possess unauthorised firearm. The maximum penalty for that is five years’ imprisonment. The maximum penalty and standard non parole period, where applicable, are of course guideposts in the sentencing exercise to which I have regard.
-
The offender pleaded guilty to the firearms charge at an early stage, and is entitled to a discount of 25%. In relation to the knowingly take part in supply offence, he was initially committed for trial, but after negotiations a plea of guilty was accepted to the offence of knowingly take part in supply of not less than a commercial quantity. It is an agreed matter that he is entitled to a discount of 10% in relation to that offence.
-
The facts of the offences are the subject of agreement and, in essence, are as follows. In 2017 and 2018, the offender was living with his brother, Ross Hitchen, in a house in Lorne Avenue, South Penrith. On 17 August 2017, police installed a surveillance device into a Ford Territory vehicle belonging to the offender’s brother, Ross. Thereafter, that device was used for the purposes of a wider investigation into the activities of Ross Hitchen and various associates. On 22 January 2018, police recorded a conversation between the offender and his brother, Ross, in which Ross asked the offender why “the step was left open.”…
Continue reading R v Hitchen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Hitchen [2020] NSWDC 753
- Case
- [2020] NSWDC 753
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved determining the appropriate sentences for each of the charges and whether there were special circumstances that warranted a departure from the standard sentencing guidelines. The court had to consider the totality of the accused’s offending, the impact on the community, and the principles of parity in sentencing.
In delivering the judgment, the court found that special circumstances existed due to the significant role the accused played in the drug supply chain and the presence of the unauthorised firearm. The court considered the Form 1, which acknowledged the accused's early guilty plea. After weighing these factors, the court imposed an aggregate sentence of six years, with a non-parole period of three years and ten months. This sentence took into account the need for general and specific deterrence, as well as the rehabilitation of the accused.
The court's final orders included convictions on the charges of knowingly taking part in the supply of a commercial quantity of methylamphetamine and possessing an unauthorised firearm, with the specified sentences and non-parole periods. The charge of possessing a large commercial quantity of methylamphetamine was withdrawn and dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 6 years with a NPP of 3 years 10 months (11/10/18-10/8/22). I find special circumstances.
Indicative sentences:
Proceeding 008 Knowingly take part in supply comm qty – 5 years 10 months with NPP 3 years 9 months (Form 1 taken into account).
Proceeding 003 Possess unauthorised firearm – 6 months.
Seq 6 Supply large commercial qty – withdrawn and dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.