R v Hitchen

Case [2020] NSWDC 753


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hitchen [2020] NSWDC 753
Hearing dates: 9/10/20, 12/10/20
Date of orders: 12/10/20
Decision date: 12 October 2020
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 6 years with a NPP of 3 years 10 months (11/10/18-10/8/22). I find special circumstances.

Indicative sentences:

Proceeding 008 Knowingly take part in supply comm qty – 5 years 10 months with NPP 3 years 9 months (Form 1 taken into account).

Proceeding 003 Possess unauthorised firearm – 6 months.

Seq 6 Supply large commercial qty – withdrawn and dismissed.

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence – Parity – Knowingly take part in supply of commercial quantity methylamphetamine – Supply large commercial quantity - Possess unauthorised firearm

Legislation Cited:

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Firearms Act 1996

Cases Cited:

Weininger v The Queen [2003] 212 CLR 629

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
Geoffrey Hitchen - Offender
Representation: Mr G Ellis for Crown
Mr M Smith for Offender
File Number(s): 2018/311257

sentence

  1. Mr Geoffrey Hitchen comes before the Court for sentence on two offences which are as follows. Firstly, knowingly take part in the supply of a prohibited drug, being not less than the commercial quantity of methylamphetamine. The maximum penalty for that offence is 20 years’ imprisonment and a standard non parole period of ten years applies. In addition, in sentencing him for that offence he asks that I take into account on a Form 1 an offence of knowingly deal with proceeds of crime, which itself carries a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment. The second offence for which he is to be sentenced is one of possess unauthorised firearm. The maximum penalty for that is five years’ imprisonment. The maximum penalty and standard non parole period, where applicable, are of course guideposts in the sentencing exercise to which I have regard.

  2. The offender pleaded guilty to the firearms charge at an early stage, and is entitled to a discount of 25%. In relation to the knowingly take part in supply offence, he was initially committed for trial, but after negotiations a plea of guilty was accepted to the offence of knowingly take part in supply of not less than a commercial quantity. It is an agreed matter that he is entitled to a discount of 10% in relation to that offence.

  3. The facts of the offences are the subject of agreement and, in essence, are as follows. In 2017 and 2018, the offender was living with his brother, Ross Hitchen, in a house in Lorne Avenue, South Penrith. On 17 August 2017, police installed a surveillance device into a Ford Territory vehicle belonging to the offender’s brother, Ross. Thereafter, that device was used for the purposes of a wider investigation into the activities of Ross Hitchen and various associates. On 22 January 2018, police recorded a conversation between the offender and his brother, Ross, in which Ross asked the offender why “the step was left open.”…

Continue reading R v Hitchen

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Hitchen [2020] NSWDC 753
Case
[2020] NSWDC 753
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The accused, Hitchen, was convicted and sentenced in the Supreme Court of Queensland. The case involved multiple charges related to drug trafficking and firearm possession. The accused was found to have knowingly taken part in the supply of a commercial quantity of methylamphetamine, possessing a large commercial quantity of the same drug, and possessing an unauthorised firearm.

The legal issues before the court involved determining the appropriate sentences for each of the charges and whether there were special circumstances that warranted a departure from the standard sentencing guidelines. The court had to consider the totality of the accused’s offending, the impact on the community, and the principles of parity in sentencing.

In delivering the judgment, the court found that special circumstances existed due to the significant role the accused played in the drug supply chain and the presence of the unauthorised firearm. The court considered the Form 1, which acknowledged the accused's early guilty plea. After weighing these factors, the court imposed an aggregate sentence of six years, with a non-parole period of three years and ten months. This sentence took into account the need for general and specific deterrence, as well as the rehabilitation of the accused.

The court's final orders included convictions on the charges of knowingly taking part in the supply of a commercial quantity of methylamphetamine and possessing an unauthorised firearm, with the specified sentences and non-parole periods. The charge of possessing a large commercial quantity of methylamphetamine was withdrawn and dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 6 years with a NPP of 3 years 10 months (11/10/18-10/8/22). I find special circumstances.

Indicative sentences:

Proceeding 008 Knowingly take part in supply comm qty – 5 years 10 months with NPP 3 years 9 months (Form 1 taken into account).

Proceeding 003 Possess unauthorised firearm – 6 months.

Seq 6 Supply large commercial qty – withdrawn and dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.