District Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hemsworth [2021] NSWDC 638 Hearing dates: 27 August 2021 Date of orders: 10 September 2021 Decision date: 10 September 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Buscombe DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence imposed one of 18 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 13 years and 10 months
Catchwords: CRIME — Violent offences — Cause grievous bodily harm with intent
CRIME — Parental responsibility — Failure to provide necessities of life
CRIME — Public justice offences — Do an act with intent to pervert course of justice
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 33(1)(b), 43A(2), 319,
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 25F
Cases Cited: Nasrallah v The Queen [2015] NSWCCA 188
Category: Sentence Parties: Brendan Ray Hemsworth (Offender)
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)Representation: Counsel:
Mr Davies (Offender)
Ms O’Meagher (Crown)
File Number(s): 2019/00153458 Publication restriction: Non-publication order in relation to victim’s name
SENTENCE
Introduction
-
The offender stood trial by a jury in relation to an indictment containing four counts, the particulars of which I will shortly explain. The offender was convicted by the jury of count 1 and count 3. Count 2 was an alternative to count 1 so no verdict was taken on that count. The offender pleaded guilty to count 4 on the indictment at the commencement of the trial before the jury, having indicated a plea of guilty to that count in the Local Court. Count 1 contained an offence that between 8 March 2019 and 13 March 2019 at Iluka the offender caused grievous bodily harm to SH with intent to cause her grievous bodily harm. That is an offence under s 33(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1900 and has a maximum penalty of 25 years’ imprisonment and there is an applicable standard non‑parole period of seven years.
-
Count 3 contained an offence that between 8 March and 13 March 2019 at Iluka the offender, being a person having parental responsibility for SH, intentionally and without reasonable excuse failed to provide SH with the necessities of life, namely, medical care and attention, and the result of that failure caused a danger of death to SH. That is an offence under s 43A(2) of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of five years’ imprisonment and there is no applicable standard non‑parole period. Count 4 contained an offence that between 8 March and 23 May 2019 at Iluka the offender created and maintained a false alibi with the intention of avoiding prosecution in relation to the injuries inflicted upon SH, thereby intending to pervert the course of justice. That is an offence under s 319 of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of 14 years’ imprisonment and there is no applicable standard non‑parole period.
The Facts
-
Turning then to the facts. These being essentially sentence…
Continue reading R v Hemsworth
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Hemsworth [2021] NSWDC 638
- Case
- [2021] NSWDC 638
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues in the case centred around the interpretation and application of various criminal statutes. The court had to determine the extent of the defendant's culpability in each offence, the appropriate sentencing principles to apply, and whether the offences were interrelated in a manner that would warrant an aggregate sentence. The court also needed to consider the impact of the defendant's actions on the victim and the broader community.
The court found that the defendant's actions were deliberate and showed a clear disregard for the well-being of his child. It was held that the offences were interrelated and warranted an aggregate sentence. The court considered the seriousness of the offences, the vulnerability of the victim, and the need to protect the community. After weighing these factors, the court imposed a sentence of 18 years and six months, with a non-parole period of 13 years and 10 months. This sentence reflects the gravity of the defendant's actions and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Aggregate sentence imposed one of 18 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 13 years and 10 months
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.