R v Hasselberg

Case [2023] NSWDC 601


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Hasselberg [2023] NSWDC 601
Hearing dates: 3 November 2022
Date of orders: 15 November 2023
Decision date: 15 November 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Scotting DCJ
Decision:

1   Taine Hasselberg is convicted.

2   After taking into account the discount for the plea of guilty and 3 months of presentence custody, I impose a term of imprisonment of 2 years.

3 Pursuant to s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, the sentence imposed is to be served by way of an ICO. The sentence will commence today (3 November 2023) and expire on 2 November 2025.

4   The offender must report to the Leichhardt Community Corrections Office on or before 4pm on 10 November 2023 The standard conditions of the order apply:

(a)   the offender must not commit any offence; and

(b)   the offender must submit to supervision by a Community Corrections Officer.

5   The following additional conditions apply:

(a)   the offender must abstain from taking all restricted or prohibited drugs, except those prescribed by a medical practitioner;

(b)   the offender must receive treatment for his mental health as reasonably directed by Community Corrections;

(c)   the offender must receive treatment for drug rehabilitation as reasonably directed by Community Corrections; and

(d)   the offender must complete 200 hours of community service work.

Catchwords:

CRIME — Violent offences — Armed robbery — Offensive weapon

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Legge v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 244

Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120

R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346

R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270

R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCA 17

Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Taine Hasselberg (Offender)
Representation: Solicitors:
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Legal Aid of NSW (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/105768
Publication restriction: None

JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. Taine Hasselberg (the offender) appears for sentence after pleading guilty in the Local Court to an offence of robbery armed with an offensive weapon, contrary to section 97(1) Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty for the offence is 20 years imprisonment.

Approach to Sentencing

  1. To the extent that I make findings of fact adverse to the offender, I am satisfied of that fact beyond reasonable doubt. To the extent that I make findings of fact favourable to the offender, I am satisfied of that fact on the balance of probabilities: R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 at [27] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, Hayne and Callinan JJ).

  2. I have taken into account the purposes of sentencing set out in s 3A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 and had regard to the matters set out in s 21A of the Act.

  3. The offender entered a plea of guilty in the Local Court and are entitled to a 25% discount on sentence: s 25D(2)(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.

Procedural History

  1. When the matter was first listed for sentence in November 2022, I deferred sentencing for 12 months pursuant to s 11 Crimes…

Continue reading R v Hasselberg

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Hasselberg [2023] NSWDC 601
Case
[2023] NSWDC 601
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Hasselberg, Taine Hasselberg stood trial in the District Court of New South Wales for the crime of armed robbery, where he used an offensive weapon during the commission of the offence. Hasselberg entered a plea of guilty, which led to a sentencing hearing. The primary legal issue for the court was to determine the appropriate term of imprisonment, considering the plea of guilty and the applicable legal principles, including the discount for the plea and the period of presentence custody already served.

The court considered the nature and circumstances of the offence, the offender's criminal history, and the principles of justice and deterrence. The discount for the plea of guilty and the three months of presentence custody were factored into the sentencing calculation. The court also examined the offender's mental health and drug dependency issues, which were identified as contributing factors to the offending behaviour. Taking all these matters into account, the court imposed a term of imprisonment of two years, reduced by the plea discount and presentence custody. The sentence is to be served as an Intensive Corrections Order (ICO), beginning on 3 November 2023 and expiring on 2 November 2025.

The court's reasoning was rooted in the need to balance the principles of punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation. The imposition of an ICO was deemed appropriate, given the offender's mental health and drug dependency issues. The court set specific conditions for the ICO, including abstention from drugs, participation in mental health and drug rehabilitation treatment, and completion of 200 hours of community service work. The offender is required to report to the Leichhardt Community Corrections Office by 4pm on 10 November 2023, and the standard conditions of the ICO, along with the additional conditions, will apply.

Orders

Orders of the court

1 Taine Hasselberg is convicted.

2 After taking into account the discount for the plea of guilty and 3 months of presentence custody, I impose a term of imprisonment of 2 years.

3 Pursuant to s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, the sentence imposed is to be served by way of an ICO. The sentence will commence today (3 November 2023) and expire on 2 November 2025.

4 The offender must report to the Leichhardt Community Corrections Office on or before 4pm on 10 November 2023 The standard conditions of the order apply:

(a) the offender must not commit any offence; and

(b) the offender must submit to supervision by a Community Corrections Officer.

5 The following additional conditions apply:

(a) the offender must abstain from taking all restricted or prohibited drugs, except those prescribed by a medical practitioner;

(b) the offender must receive treatment for his mental health as reasonably directed by Community Corrections;

(c) the offender must receive treatment for drug rehabilitation as reasonably directed by Community Corrections; and

(d) the offender must complete 200 hours of community service work.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.