R v Harrod (No 2)
[2011] QCA 303
•27 October 2011
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
R v Harrod (No 2) [2011] QCA 303
PARTIES:
R
v
HARROD, Martin
(applicant)FILE NO/S:
CA No 242 of 2011
SC No 66 of 1988DIVISION:
Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING:
Application for Extension (Sentence)
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court at Mackay
DELIVERED EX TEMPORE ON:
27 October 2011DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
27 October 2011
JUDGES:
Chief Justice, Fraser JA and Margaret Wilson AJA
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the order madeORDER:
Delivered ex tempore on 27 October 2011:
The application for an extension of time is refused.
CATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – PROCEDURE – NOTICES OF APPEAL – TIME FOR APPEAL AND EXTENSION THEREOF – where the applicant pleaded guilty to murder 23 years ago and was sentenced to life imprisonment – whether the Court has power to vary a sentence of life imprisonment on appeal
R v Harrod [2011] QCA 4, cited
COUNSEL:
The applicant appeared on his own behalf
R G Martin SC for the respondentSOLICITORS:
The applicant appeared on his own behalf
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent
FRASER JA: On 31 August 2011 the applicant applied for an extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal against his sentence of life imprisonment. That sentence was imposed more than 23 years ago when the applicant pleaded guilty to the murder of Gretchen Smith.
On 8 February 2011 the Court refused the applicant's earlier application for an extension of time to appeal against conviction and for leave to appeal against sentence: see R v Harrod [2011] QCA 4. As the Court then explained, the life sentence imposed upon the applicant was the only sentence which the law permitted. The Court has no power on an appeal against sentence to vary a life sentence imposed for murder, whether by adding a provision for parole or otherwise.
The application for an extension of time should be refused.
CHIEF JUSTICE: I agree.
MARGARET WILSON AJA: I agree.
CHIEF JUSTICE: The application is refused.
0