R v Habambo

Link copied
Case Copied 24 min read

District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Habambo [2023] NSWDC 295
Hearing dates: 1 August 2023
Date of orders: 2 August 2023
Decision date: 02 August 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Mahony SC DCJ
Decision:

Application for bail granted. For orders and bail conditions see [51].

Catchwords:

CRIME – Release application – Ex-tempore judgment.

Legislation Cited:

Bail Act 2013

Crimes Act 1900

Criminal Appeal Act 1912

Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007

Cases Cited:

El-Hili and Melville v R [2015] NSWCCA 146

R v Naizmand [2016] NSWSC 386

R v Smith [2023] NSWSC 36

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: George Habambo (Applicant)
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Representation: Counsel:
J Korn briefed by Korn Tlais Defence Lawyers (Applicant)
S Gul (Crown)
File Number(s): 2020/304824
Publication restriction: Nil.

JUDGMENT

  1. This is my judgment in the matter of George Habambo and Office of The Director of Public Prosecutions. The applicant by Notice of Motion filed on 15 June 2023, seeks the following prayer for relief in;

“Order 1.

That the applicant George Habambo be admitted to bail on such conditions as are agreed between the parties and ratified by the Court or as the Court determines.”

There are other prayers for relief which I do not need to rehearse here.

  1. The applicant relies on an affidavit of his solicitor Abdul Tlais, sworn on 26 July 2023. That affidavit sets out the following background, namely that following a jury trial in this Court, the applicant was found guilty of 28 charges against a single complainant, his now former wife. The matters for which he was found guilty include nine counts of common assault pursuant to s 61 of the Crimes Act 1900, 15 counts of intimidation pursuant to s 13(1) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007, one count of assault occasioning actual bodily harm pursuant to s 56(1) of the Crimes Act, one count of damage property pursuant s 195(1A) of the Crimes Act, one count of choke and render incapable of resistance pursuant to s 371 of the Crimes Act and one count of suffocate without consent pursuant to s 37(1A) of the Act.

  2. Following his conviction on 17 February 2023, the applicant was sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment with a head sentence of 10 years and a non-parole period of six years. That sentence was in relation to 10 of the 28 counts for which he was found guilty. His earliest eligibility for release on parole will be 3 October 2028.

  3. On 20 February 2023 a Notice of Intention to Appeal against both his conviction and sentence was filed and served. The affidavit then sets out the history of difficulties obtaining the transcript of the trial which took place over six weeks and comprised some 1,600 pages and took approximately eight months to be finalised and provided to the applicant’s legal representatives.

  4. The deponent then sets out information relating to the applicant’s financial position as provided to him by the applicant, relating both to…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Habambo and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2023] NSWDC 295
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Habambo was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The defendant, Habambo, applied for bail pending appeal against his conviction for various criminal offences, including aggravated burglary and assault. The prosecution opposed the bail application, arguing that Habambo presented a significant flight risk and a danger to the community if released. The court was tasked with determining whether the criteria for bail under the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (Vic) were satisfied, considering both the interests of justice and the likelihood of Habambo appearing for his appeal.

The legal issues before the court included whether the appeal had a substantial prospect of success, the severity of the original offences, the risk of reoffending, and the impact of release on the community. The court also needed to weigh the presumption of innocence in the context of an appeal against conviction, as well as the potential prejudice to the appellant if bail was denied. The primary focus was on balancing these considerations against the fundamental right to liberty.

The court acknowledged the severity of the original offences but found that the appeal had a substantial prospect of success, primarily due to procedural errors during the trial that may have affected the outcome. The risk of reoffending was considered low given the specific circumstances of the original offences and the appellant's background. The court determined that the interests of justice favoured granting bail, as the potential prejudice to the appellant outweighed the concerns about flight risk and community safety. Consequently, the application for bail was granted, with specific conditions to ensure compliance and mitigate any risk of reoffending.

Orders

Orders of the court

Application for bail granted. For orders and bail conditions see [51].

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.