R v Goodwin

Case [2015] NSWSC 2107


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Goodwin [2015] NSWSC 2107
Hearing dates:11 March 2015
Date of orders: 11 March 2015
Decision date: 11 March 2015
Before: Harrison J
Decision:

Bail refused

Catchwords: BAIL – show cause requirement – throwing explosive with intent to maim – young man – first time in custody – show cause requirement met – concern applicant may commit serious offence and/or endanger the safety of victims or the community – limited but indicative criminal history – bail refused
Category:Procedural and other rulings
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Blake John Goodwin (Applicant)
File Number(s):2015/00052478
Publication restriction:Nil

EX-TEMPORE Judgment

  1. HIS HONOUR: Blake Goodwin applies for bail. He was born in June 1993 and is some weeks short of his 22nd birthday.

  2. He was arrested on 23 December last year and charged with a series of offences including larceny, supplying a prohibited firearm to an unauthorised person, assault occasioning actual bodily harm and for present purposes significantly throwing explosive with intent to maim a named victim.

  3. These matters are listed for mention in the Central Local Court on 9 April this year when it is anticipated that the balance of the brief will be served. Mr Goodwin has been in custody bail refused since the date of his arrest. The Crown opposes bail.

  4. The applicant is charged with a show cause offence and needs initially to demonstrate that there are reasons why his continued custody should not be continued. He is a young man and is in gaol for the first time. Those matters appear to me to demonstrate a sufficient indication that he has shown cause why his continued custody is not justified.

  5. The Crown has indicated that it is concerned about a number of matters described in the Act as bail concerns. It is sufficient for present purposes to deal only with two. The first is that there is a concern that the applicant may commit a serious offence and/or endanger the safety of victims or the community.

  6. Although I am not called upon to determine the truth or otherwise of the allegations which found the charges facing the applicant, the brief facts include the proposition that the applicant, armed with a container of petrol, followed or chased the victim some distance spreading petrol on the ground and ultimately to some extent upon her, which he attempted unsuccessfully in the events that occurred to ignite.

  7. That behaviour in the context of the applicant’s limited but to some degree indicative criminal history, seems to me seriously to inform the proposition that bail conditions of the sort I am able to impose cannot operate sufficiently to mitigate the bail concerns that the Crown has identified.

  8. I am troubled that a refusal of bail will lead to a considerable period on remand for a young man in custody for the first time. Bearing in mind that the activity upon which I am presently engaged is definitively a balancing activity, it seems to me that on balance, for the reasons I have identified, bail should be refused.

**********

Details
AGLC
R v Goodwin [2015] NSWSC 2107
Case
[2015] NSWSC 2107
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved the defendant, Goodwin, who was charged with throwing an explosive with the intent to maim. The applicant faced the court seeking bail. The case was heard in a jurisdiction under Australian law. Goodwin, a first-time offender, presented himself in custody for this serious charge, which implicated his potential to commit further offences and pose a risk to the community.

The central legal issue was whether Goodwin should be granted bail. The court needed to consider whether the prosecution had met the requirement to show cause why bail should not be granted. The court also had to assess Goodwin's potential to commit further offences and endanger the safety of the victims or the community, in light of his limited but indicative criminal history.

In assessing these matters, the court found that the prosecution had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant denying bail. Goodwin's potential to commit further serious offences and endanger the community was deemed high, especially given the nature of the current charge. The court concluded that granting bail would not be in the interests of justice. Therefore, Goodwin's application for bail was refused.

The court ordered that Goodwin remain in custody pending the resolution of his charges. This decision was grounded in the seriousness of the offence and the risk Goodwin posed to the community, despite his lack of a substantial criminal history.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.