Supreme Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v French [2021] NSWSC 1531 Hearing dates: 5 November 2021 Date of orders: 26 November 2021 Decision date: 26 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Dhanji J Decision: The offender is convicted of the manslaughter of Cheryl Ardler and the unlawful disposal of her body.
For the offence of disposal of the deceased’s body, the offender is sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years and 8 months commencing from 14 February 2019 and expiring on 13 October 2021 with a non-parole period of 2 years expiring on 13 February 2021.
For the offence of manslaughter, the offender is sentenced to imprisonment for 9 years commencing from 14 February 2020 and expiring on 13 February 2029 with a non-parole period of 6 years expiring on 13 February 2026.
Catchwords: SENTENCING – remarks on sentence – manslaughter – unlawful and dangerous act – disposal of corpse – where offender killed his partner and concealed her body – where remains not found for five and a half years – history of personal violence offences – background of deprivation – special circumstances – plea of guilty – new count offence – limited evidence of remorse
Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 12
Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), ss 5A, 25C
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 25A, 25B, 25D
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 24
Cases Cited: Bentley v R; Davies v R; Thomas v R; Tilley v R [2021] NSWCCA 18
Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194
Hampton v R [2014] NSWCCA 131; (2014) 243 A Crim R 193
R v Aljubouri; R v YA; R v Shaker [2019] NSWSC 180
R v Blacklidge (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 12 December 1995, unrep)
R v Donald William Reeves [2017] NSWSC 813
R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374
R v MAK; R v MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159
R v Merrick (No 5) [2016] NSWSC 661
R v Niass (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 16 November 1988, unrep)
Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown)
Dennis Andrew French (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
A Robertson (Crown)
N Steel (Offender)
Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown)
Naomi Steinberg Lawyers (Offender)
File Number(s): 2019/112193 Publication restriction: Nil.
Remarks on sentence
-
The offender, Dennis Andrew French, stands to be sentenced for the manslaughter of his then partner, Cheryl Ardler (“the deceased”) on 12 December 2012. He pleaded guilty to that offence and one count of wilfully disposing of the dead body of the deceased, her having died a violent death, before the coroner had had the…
Continue reading R v French
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v French [2021] NSWSC 1531
- Case
- [2021] NSWSC 1531
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate, whether the appellant's history of personal violence and background of deprivation were relevant to sentencing, and whether the lack of evidence of remorse was a significant factor in the sentencing. The court also considered whether the disposal of the corpse was an aggravating factor in the sentencing.
The court held that the sentence imposed was manifestly inadequate and should be increased. The history of personal violence and background of deprivation were relevant to sentencing, but the lack of evidence of remorse was a significant factor. The disposal of the corpse was an aggravating factor in the sentencing. The court found that the appellant's history of personal violence and background of deprivation were significant factors in the sentencing, but the lack of evidence of remorse was a significant factor that outweighed these other considerations. The court also found that the disposal of the corpse was an aggravating factor in the sentencing, but it was not the sole factor that led to the increase in sentence.
The final orders of the court were that the appeal against sentence was allowed, and the appellant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment with a non-parole period of 15 years.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.