R v FP

Case

[2007] QCA 71

14/03/2007

No judgment structure available for this case.

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:  R v FP [2007] QCA 71
PARTIES:  R
v
FP
(appellant)
FILE NO/S:  CA No 336 of 2006 DC No 112 of 2006
DIVISION:  Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING:  Appeal against Conviction
ORIGINATING 
COURT: 
District Court at Mount Isa
DELIVERED EX 
TEMPORE ON:  14 March 2007
DELIVERED AT:  Brisbane
HEARING DATE:  14 March 2007
JUDGES:  Jerrard JA and Muir and Douglas JJ
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court,
each concurring as to the orders made
ORDERS:  1. Appeal allowed
2. Conviction set aside
2. Re-trial ordered
3. The appellant be granted bail on his own undertaking
conditioned that he appear and surrender himself into
custody on any re-trial of this charge on a date and place
to be notified to him by the Director of Public
Prosecutions.
CATCHWORDS:  CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – OBJECTIONS AND POINTS NOT RAISED IN COURT BELOW – MISDIRECTION AND NON-DIRECTION – PARTICULAR CASES – where the applicant was convicted for unlawfully and indecently dealing with a child under the age of 12 – where the sentencing judge failed to direct on preliminary complaint and on hearsay – whether these misdirections resulted in a miscarriage of justice
Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 1978 (Qld), s 4A
Evidence Act 1977 (Qld), s 93A, Pt 4A
Dhanhoa v The Queen (2003) 217 CLR 1, applied
Jones v The Queen (1997) 143 ALR 52, applied
R v Cox [1986] 2 Qd R 55, applied
RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620, applied
TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124, applied
Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300, applied
COUNSEL:  T D Martin SC, with J R Hunter, for the appellant
M J Copley for the respondent
SOLICITORS:  Anderson Telford Lawyers for the appellant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Qld) for the respondent

JERRARD JA: The order will be that the conviction incurred on 1 December, 2006 for unlawfully and indecently dealing with a child under the age of 12 years is set aside and a re-trial is ordered. The Court will publish its reasons at a later date.

...

JERRARD JA: Thank you. Yes well the appellant will be granted bail on his own undertaking conditioned that he appear and surrender himself into custody on any re-trial of this charge on a date and place to be notified to him by the Director of Public Prosecutions.

-----

2   ORDER

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

6

Statutory Material Cited

0

R v Young [2020] QCA 3
R v Young [2020] QCA 3
Jones v The Queen [1997] HCA 12