R v Foxe

Case [2002] QCA 226


[2002] QCA 226

COURT OF APPEAL

DAVIES JA
WILLIAMS JA
JERRARD JA

CA No 376 of 2000

THE QUEEN

v.

PETER WILLIAM FOXE

BRISBANE

..DATE 24/06/2002

ORDER

DAVIES JA:  The Court is of the view that this application for leave to appeal should be struck out, noting that it should not, in the view of the Court, impede the applicant's prospects of seeking an extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal if, in fact, of some future date, the applicant is able to give instructions with respect to the appeal to his solicitors.

Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is struck out.

WILLIAMS JA:  I agree.

JERRARD JA:  I agree.

-----

Details
AGLC
R v Foxe [2002] QCA 226
Case
[2002] QCA 226
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of R v Foxe, the case involved the applicant, Peter William Foxe, seeking leave to appeal against his conviction and sentence. The appeal was heard by the Court of Appeal, with Justice Davies presiding, and Justices Williams and Jerard sitting as fellow judges. The applicant had been convicted and sentenced for various criminal offences, and he sought to challenge the conviction and sentence on appeal.

The legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the application for leave to appeal was made within the required time frame and whether there were any exceptional circumstances that warranted an extension of the time limit. The Court had to determine whether the applicant's application was made in a timely manner and whether there were any grounds for granting an extension of time for the application.

The Court of Appeal held that the applicant's application for leave to appeal was not made within the required time frame. However, the Court also noted that the applicant had not been represented by legal counsel when the application was made. The Court considered that the applicant's prospects of successfully appealing against his conviction and sentence were not impeded by the striking out of the application for leave to appeal. The Court further noted that the applicant could seek an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal if he was able to provide instructions to his solicitors in the future.

In conclusion, the Court of Appeal struck out the application for leave to appeal, but the Court did not impede the applicant's prospects of seeking an extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal if, in fact, of some future date, the applicant was able to give instructions with respect to the appeal to his solicitors. The Court held that the applicant's application for leave to appeal was not made within the required time frame, but the Court also noted that the applicant had not been represented by legal counsel when the application was made.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.