District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v FLORES [2024] NSWDC 457 Hearing dates: 15 August 2024 Decision date: 27 September 2024 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: NOMAN SC DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence imposed. Indicative sentences nominated: Sequence 10, possession offence: 16 months; Sequence 11, trafficking offence: 3 years and 8 months; Sequence 12, import offence: 5 years and 4 months. Sentence imposed is 6 years and 2 months with a non-parole period of 4 years to commence 30 May 2023. Eligible for release to parole 29 May 2027.
Catchwords: SENTENCING — Drug offences — Commonwealth offences – possess marketable quantity of unlawfully imported border-controlled drug – traffic marketable quantity of controlled drug – import marketable quantity of border-controlled drug – imprisonment
Legislation Cited: S16A Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)
ss302.3, 307.2, 307.6, 311.2 and 311.4 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)
Cases Cited: Category: Sentence Parties: Rex;
Bryan FloresRepresentation: Counsel:
Crown: D New
Defence: D Berents
File Number(s): 2023/173033
JUDGMENT
-
The offender, Bryan Flores, entered pleas of guilty in the Local Court to the following three offences:
Possess marketable quantity of unlawfully imported border-controlled drug (namely cocaine) contrary to section 307.6(1) of the Commonwealth Criminal Code;
Traffic in marketable quantity of a controlled drug (namely cocaine) contrary to section 302.3(1) and section 311.2 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code; and
Import marketable quantity of border-controlled drug (namely cocaine) contrary to section 307.2(1) and section 311.4 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code.
-
The maximum penalty for each of these offences is imprisonment for 25 years and/or 5000 penalty units.
-
The general sentencing principles that I must apply are contained in Part 1B of the Crimes Act, 1914 (Cth) (‘the Act’). In determining the sentence to be passed, I must impose a sentence that is of a severity appropriate in all the circumstances of the offence: s16A(1) Crimes Act. I must also take into account the matters listed in s16A(2) of the Act.
-
On 10 April 2024 the offender entered pleas of guilty in the Local Court.
-
The Crown tendered the agreed facts, criminal history, custodial history and the Sentencing Assessment Report. Written submissions and a schedule of comparable cases were provided.
-
The offender tendered 15 documents including a letter of apology [the full copy was tendered separately], a psychological report, letters of support, certificates and Corrective Services documents. Written submissions, statistics and two comparable cases were provided.
-
The limitations of the cases and statistics were acknowledged.
-
The nature and circumstances of the offences are set out in the agreed facts. To the extent a different account is asserted in a direct or hearsay account of the offender, I disregard it. I shall proceed on the facts as settled between the parties, supplemented where appropriate. The offender did not give evidence. The additional evidence sought to be relied upon, informing the facts and the subjective case, emanates from his letter and his hearsay representations.
-
The first time the offender, an American citizen, contemplated involvement was…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Flores and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] NSWDC 457
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the severity and impact of the offences, which involved a significant quantity of a dangerous drug. It also examined Flores's role in the drug-related activities, including the planning and execution of the importation and trafficking. The court assessed the seriousness of each offence and the need to deter similar conduct in the future. The court applied the principles of cumulative sentencing, taking into account the overlapping nature of the offences, to ensure the overall punishment reflected the total criminality involved. The court concluded that an aggregate sentence was appropriate, balancing the need for punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation.
The court determined that the indicative sentences for the possession, trafficking, and import offences were 16 months, 3 years and 8 months, and 5 years and 4 months, respectively. However, the court imposed an aggregate sentence of 6 years and 2 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 4 years. Flores will be eligible for parole release on 29 May 2027. This decision reflects the court's consideration of the totality of Flores's criminal conduct, the need to ensure public safety, and the principles of justice in sentencing.
Orders
Orders of the court
Aggregate sentence imposed. Indicative sentences nominated: Sequence 10, possession offence: 16 months; Sequence 11, trafficking offence: 3 years and 8 months; Sequence 12, import offence: 5 years and 4 months. Sentence imposed is 6 years and 2 months with a non-parole period of 4 years to commence 30 May 2023. Eligible for release to parole 29 May 2027.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.