R v Fell

Case [2023] NSWDC 353


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fell [2023] NSWDC 353
Hearing dates: 01 September 2023
Date of orders: 01 September 2023
Decision date: 01 September 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Scotting DCJ
Decision:

1 Graham Ronald Fell is convicted.

2 The appropriate aggregate term of imprisonment is 3 years, which will be reduced by 7 months to take into account the offender’s pre-sentence custody.

3 I impose an aggregate term of imprisonment of 2 years and 5 months.

4 Pursuant to s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, the sentence imposed is to be served by way of an ICO. The sentence will commence today (1 September 2023) and expire on 31 January 2026.

Catchwords:

CRIME — Property offences — Break, enter and commit serious indictable offence

CRIME — Fraud — Dishonestly obtain property by deception

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Mandranis v R [2021] NSWCCA 97

R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270

R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCA 17

Category:Sentence
Parties: Rex (Crown)
Graham Ronald Fell (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:

Solicitors:
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Aboriginal Legal Service (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/249626
Publication restriction: None

JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. Graham Fell (the offender) appears for sentence after pleading guilty in the Local Court to the following offences:

Sequence

H89864714

Offence

Maximum Penalty and SNPP

1

Aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence (larceny), contrary to s 112(2) Crimes Act 1900

20 years imprisonment;

5 years SNPP

26

Dishonestly obtain property by deception, contrary to s 192E(1)(a), Crimes Act 1900

10 years imprisonment;

no SNPP

Approach to Sentencing

  1. To the extent that I make findings of fact adverse to the offender, I am satisfied of that fact beyond reasonable doubt. To the extent that I make findings of fact favourable to the offender, I am satisfied of that fact on the balance of probabilities: R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 at [27] (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, Hayne and Callinan JJ).

  2. I have taken into account the purposes of sentencing set out in s 3A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 and had regard to the matters set out in s 21A of the Act.

  3. The offender entered a plea of guilty in the Local Court and is entitled to a 25% discount on sentence: s 25D(2)(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.

Facts

  1. The parties presented an Agreed Statement of Facts. I have taken the entirety of the document into account in coming to an appropriate sentence. What follows is a brief summary of the facts relevant to the offender to permit an understanding of the sentence imposed.

  2. The victim, Yohei Okawa, resided at a three-storey boarding house in Surry Hills.

  3. At about 7:30pm on 20 August 2022, he returned home. He closed his door but left it unlocked. He went to sleep at around 2:00am.

  4. CCTV footage recorded the offender walking around the outside of the boarding house, before gaining entry via the front door…

Continue reading R v Fell

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Fell [2023] NSWDC 353
Case
[2023] NSWDC 353
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The defendant, Graham Ronald Fell, faced the court in relation to a case involving serious property offences. The charges against him included breaking and entering a property with intent to commit a serious indictable offence, as well as defrauding a person by deception with the intent to obtain property. The case was heard in a relevant Australian court, which was tasked with determining the guilt of the accused and subsequently sentencing him if found guilty.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the defendant had indeed committed the crimes as charged and, if so, what the appropriate penalty should be. The court had to examine the evidence presented to establish whether the defendant’s actions met the legal criteria for the offences of breaking and entering with intent to commit a serious indictable offence and obtaining property by deception. This involved assessing the credibility of the witnesses and the sufficiency of the evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Upon reviewing the evidence, the court found Graham Ronald Fell guilty on both charges. The court then proceeded to determine the appropriate sentence, taking into account various factors such as the severity of the offences, the defendant's criminal history, and the principles of sentencing under the relevant legislation. After careful consideration, the court decided on an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years, reduced by 7 months to account for the time the defendant had already spent in custody prior to sentencing. Consequently, the court imposed a sentence of 2 years and 5 months to be served as an Intensive Corrections Order, starting on 1 September 2023 and concluding on 31 January 2026.

Orders

Orders of the court

1 Graham Ronald Fell is convicted.

2 The appropriate aggregate term of imprisonment is 3 years, which will be reduced by 7 months to take into account the offender’s pre-sentence custody.

3 I impose an aggregate term of imprisonment of 2 years and 5 months.

4 Pursuant to s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, the sentence imposed is to be served by way of an ICO. The sentence will commence today (1 September 2023) and expire on 31 January 2026.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.