R v Fam

Case [2023] NSWDC 119


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Fam [2023] NSWDC 119
Hearing dates: 30/11/22-15/12/22, 25/1/23
Date of orders: 25/1/23
Decision date: 25 January 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 2 years 7 months with a NPP of 1 year 7 months (7/5/22-6/12/23).

I find special circumstances.

The indicative sentences are:

Count 2 Common Assault – 8 months.

Count 6 AOABH – 2 years 3 months.

Seq 1 on the s166 certificate (Contravene ADVO) – 3 months.

Seq 3 on the s166 certificate (Contravene ADVO) – 4 months.

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence – Assault – Assault occasioning actual bodily harm – Breach of apprehended domestic violence orders

Legislation Cited:

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Fangaloka v R [2019] NSWCCA 173

R v Crombie [1999] NSWCCA 297

R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
Andrew Fam - Offender
Representation: Mr J Mehta for Crown
Mr J Trevallion for Def
File Number(s): 21/103838
Publication restriction: Statutory non-publication order in relation to the identity of the victim

sentence

  1. The offender, Mr Andrew Fam, stood trial in December 2022 on an eight count indictment of alleged offences against the victim involving allegations of violence and sexual assault. On 14 December 2022 the jury found him guilty of counts 2 and 6 but not guilty of the remaining counts. Count 2 is a charge of assault which carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment and count 6 is an offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm which carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment.

  2. In addition, there are two offences on a s 166 certificate which are uncontested breaches of Apprehended Domestic Violence Orders which relate to the offender's contact with and violence upon the victim on, firstly, 10 to 11 April 2021 and, secondly, 13 to 14 April 2021 being the dates of the commission of the offences in count 2 and count 6 respectively. Each of those offences, in which I am limited by the same jurisdiction or restrictions as would apply in the Local Court, carry a maximum of two years imprisonment. In making that comment I am, of course, referring to the matters on the s 166 certificate.

  3. The maximum penalties for each of the offences are important guide posts in the sentencing exercise to which I have had regard.

  4. It is for me to find the facts on which the offender is to be sentenced. My findings must be consistent with the jury's verdicts and any matters in aggravation must be proved beyond reasonable doubt while matters in mitigation only on the balance of probabilities.

FACTS

  1. I find the following facts. The offender and the victim met in about late 2017 through a mutual group of friends. However, their relationship became an intimate one after a trip to Bali in December 2019. After this, the relationship was somewhat on and off and involved some incidents of…

Continue reading R v Fam

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Fam [2023] NSWDC 119
Case
[2023] NSWDC 119
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Fam, the defendant was convicted and sentenced for a series of criminal offences. The defendant was found guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, common assault, and breaches of an apprehended domestic violence order. The case was heard in the relevant court which imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

The primary legal issues addressed by the court included the appropriate sentence for each offence, taking into account the defendant's criminal history, the circumstances of the offences, and the need to protect the community. The court had to weigh the severity of each offence, the defendant's culpability, and any aggravating or mitigating factors. The court also had to determine whether any of the offences were part of a series of related incidents that warranted a cumulative sentence.

In determining the sentence, the court considered the nature and circumstances of the offences, the defendant's criminal history, and the need to protect the community. The court found that the offences were serious and that the defendant had shown a disregard for the law and the safety of others. The court also found that the defendant had breached an apprehended domestic violence order, which was an aggravating factor. The court concluded that the appropriate sentence was an aggregate term of imprisonment of 2 years and 7 months, with a non-parole period of 1 year and 7 months. The court found special circumstances and imposed indicative sentences for each offence, taking into account the defendant's criminal history and the need to deter future offending.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 2 years 7 months with a NPP of 1 year 7 months (7/5/22-6/12/23).

I find special circumstances.

The indicative sentences are:

Count 2 Common Assault – 8 months.

Count 6 AOABH – 2 years 3 months.

Seq 1 on the s166 certificate (Contravene ADVO) – 3 months.

Seq 3 on the s166 certificate (Contravene ADVO) – 4 months.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.