SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: R v Evans [2005] QCA 455 PARTIES: R
v
EVANS, Melissa Jane
(applicant)FILE NO/S: CA No 238 of 2005 DC No 401 of 2004 DIVISION: Court of Appeal PROCEEDING: Sentence Application ORIGINATING
COURT:District Court at Beenleigh DELIVERED EX TEMPORE ON: 8 December 2005 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARING DATE: 8 December 2005 JUDGES: de Jersey CJ, Williams JA and White J
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the court,
each concurring as to the order madeORDER: Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – APPEAL BY CONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED – where the applicant pleaded guilty to dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing death with a circumstance of aggravation in respect of alcohol – where the applicant was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment with a recommendation for eligibility for post- prison community-based release after two and a half years, and was disqualified from holding a driver’s licence for five years – where the applicant returned a blood alcohol reading of .247 – where the driving conditions were favourable and the vehicle was unregistered, uninsured and had a flat left rear tyre – where the applicant had a past conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol – where the applicant was a single mother of six children – where the applicant demonstrated remorse and cooperated with the authorities – whether the sentence was manifestly excessive R v Ibrahim [2003] QCA 386; (2003) 40 MVR 183,
considered
R v McKinnon [1999] QCA 075; CA No 356 of 1998, 17
March 1999, considered
R v Smout [2005] QCA 120; CA No 31 of 2005, 15 April
2005, considered
R v Wilde; ex parte A-G (Qld) [2002] QCA 501; (2002) 135
A Crim R 538, distinguishedCOUNSEL: T E Mossop for the applicant
M J Copley for the respondentSOLICITORS: Smith & Associates for the applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the
respondent
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The applicant was sentenced in the District Court to a six year term of imprisonment with a recommendation for eligibility for post prison community based release after two and a-half years for the offence of dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing death with a circumstance of aggravation in respect of alcohol. She was disqualified from holding a driver's licence for five years. She was also dealt with for a number of summary offences including driving while under the influence of liquor for which she was sentenced to a concurrent 12 month term.
She had pleaded guilty. She seeks leave to appeal against the sentence of six years with a recommendation after two and a- half years. Ms Mossop, her counsel, submitted that a recommendation should have been made for eligibility after 12 to 18 months, not after two and a-half years.
On 11th…
Continue reading R v Evans
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Evans [2005] QCA 455
- Case
- [2005] QCA 455
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court addressed was whether the sentence imposed on the appellant was manifestly excessive. The court considered the appellant's past criminal history, her level of intoxication at the time of the offence, the circumstances of the driving, and her personal situation as a single mother of six children. The appellant demonstrated remorse and cooperated with the authorities, which were factors weighed in determining the appropriate sentence.
In evaluating the appeal against the sentence, the court found that the sentence was not manifestly excessive. The court acknowledged the severity of the offence, particularly given the aggravating circumstance of alcohol involvement and the appellant's prior conviction. However, the court also considered the appellant's remorse, cooperation with authorities, and her personal circumstances. The court concluded that the sentence was appropriate and did not warrant a reduction. Consequently, the application for leave to appeal against the sentence was refused.
Orders
Orders of the court
Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.