District Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Esho [2023] NSWDC 195 Hearing dates: 2 June 2023 Date of orders: 9 June 2023 Decision date: 09 June 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Newlinds SC DCJ Decision: Sentence of imprisonment to be served by way of Intensive Correction Order. Orders at [51]
Catchwords: CRIME – Sentence
Legislation Cited: Cases Cited: R v Mandranis (2021) NSWCCA 97
Texts Cited: Sentence (Sixth Edition) by Stephen Odgers
Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown)
Simon Esho (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Ms Sawagid (Crown)
Mr P Strickland SC (Offender)
Solicitors:
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Karnib Saddik Law Firm (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/00137604 Publication restriction: No.
Judgment
INTRODUCTION
-
The offender, aged 27, has pleaded guilty to one offence of supplying a commercial quantity of cocaine (828 grams) contrary to s 25(2) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (“DMTA”).
-
The matter was heard on 2 June 2023 at which hearing I received into evidence a body of material together with written and oral submissions which, where relevant, I will refer to in these reasons.
The Facts
-
The agreed facts are in short compass and may be summarised as follows:
In May 2022 an investigation was commenced into the activities of the offender. These investigations identified the offender as the only resident of Unit 315 of 659-669 Gardeners Road, Mascot.
On 12 May 2022 Police attended 315/659-669 Gardeners Road, Mascot to execute a search warrant.
At approximately 5.13 pm the Police officers saw the offender exit the residence. He was approached by Police and searched. Police located four mobile phones, a case of air pods, a set of keys to the offender’s unit and a car key and an Apple watch.
The offender was told the Police had a warrant to search his unit and was asked if Police would find any drugs or money in the unit. The offender replied “nope”. The offender told Police that he lived at the unit alone and that nobody else was inside.
During the search of the offender’s bedroom, Police located two clear freezer bags containing a white powdery substance inside a pair of white Lacoste shoes. The substance inside those bags was subsequently analysed and found to be a total of 55.6 grams of cocaine.
In the spare bedroom Police located a yellow plastic bag containing a block of compressed white powder in a vacuum sealed bag. The powder was subsequently analysed and found to be 772.6 grams of cocaine.
The Police cautioned the offender before asking him some further questions in relation to the block of white powder. The offender (by way of shaking his head) implied that he had not seen the yellow bag before and did not know what was in it. The offender said the bag…
Continue reading R v Esho
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Esho [2023] NSWDC 195
- Case
- [2023] NSWDC 195
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved determining the appropriate sentence for the defendant, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the offence, as well as the defendant's personal circumstances. The court had to balance the need for punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation in accordance with statutory guidelines and judicial precedent.
The court considered various factors, including the seriousness of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, and the impact on the victim and community. The sentencing judge found that an Intensive Correction Order was the most suitable form of punishment, considering the defendant's age, potential for rehabilitation, and the need to prevent re-offending. The court also noted the importance of maintaining public confidence in the justice system and the role of sentencing in achieving that end.
The court ordered that the defendant's sentence of imprisonment be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order, with specific terms and conditions as outlined in the judgment. The defendant was to comply with these conditions and attend the program as directed by the court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Sentence of imprisonment to be served by way of Intensive Correction Order. Orders at [51]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.