| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA | Not Restricted | |
AT MELBOURNE
CRIMINAL DIVISION
No. S CR 2011 0030
| THE QUEEN |
| v |
| LIRIM EMINI |
No. S CR 2011 0035
| THE QUEEN |
| v |
| ANTHONY CHARLES BLUMBERG |
---
JUDGE: | BEACH J | |
WHERE HELD: | Melbourne | |
DATE OF HEARING: | 18-19 July 2011 | |
DATE OF SENTENCE: | 27 July 2011 | |
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | R v Emini & Blumberg | |
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2011] VSC 336 | |
---
CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Use position as a director dishonestly with the intention of gaining an advantage – Reckless and failing to exercise powers and discharge duties as a director in good faith in the best interests of a corporation – Plea of guilty – Cooperation with law enforcement agencies – Sentence of 24 months’ imprisonment, to be released on recognisance after serving 12 months – Sentencing Act 1991, s 6AAA – Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16A and 21E.
CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Use position as a director dishonestly with the intention of gaining an advantage – Plea of guilty – Cooperation with law enforcement agencies – Sentence of 12 months’ imprisonment, to be released on recognisance after serving six months – Sentencing Act 1991, s 6AAA – Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16A and 21E.
---
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Crown | Dr G.J. Lyon SC with Mr M.J. Gibson | Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) |
| For the Accused Lirim Emini | Mr R. Richter QC with Mr H.R. Carmichael | Oakley Thompson & Co |
| For the Accused Anthony Charles Blumberg | Ms J.A. Dixon SC with Mr H. de Kock | Efron & Associates |
HIS HONOUR:
Lirim Emini, you have pleaded guilty to three counts of contravening s 184 of the Corporations Act 2001. Anthony Charles Blumberg, you have pleaded guilty to one count of contravening s 184 of the Corporations Act. The maximum penalty for contravening s 184 of the Corporations Act is five years’ imprisonment and a fine of $220,000.[1]
[1]See s 1311 and Schedule 3 of the Corporations Act, and s 4AA(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth).
Mr Emini, the charges to which you have pleaded guilty are as follows:
(a)Charge 1: In about July 2006, you, being a director of Leveraged Capital Pty Ltd, used your position dishonestly, with the intention of gaining an advantage for Riqueza Holdings Ltd and yourself, by causing a transfer of securities held by Leveraged Capital to Riqueza, namely 23,602,799 units of Bolnisi Gold NL shares and 34,147,750 units of Kings Minerals NL shares.
(b)Charge 2: Between 7 January 2008 and 21 February 2008, you, being a director of Leveraged Capital, used your position dishonestly with the intention of gaining an advantage for Opes Prime Stockbroking Limited and yourself, by causing a transfer of securities held by Leveraged Capital to Riqueza, of the following:
-4,000,000 units of Coeur D’Alene Mines Corporation shares;
-651,000 units of Goodman Fielder Ltd shares;
-417,291 units of Cudeco Ltd shares;
-10,000,000 units of Kings Minerals NL shares;
-1,415,000 units of Coeur D’Alene Mines Corporation…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Emini and Blumberg and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2011] VSC 336
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the nature and extent of the defendants’ criminal conduct, their culpability, and the principles of sentencing applicable to the circumstances. Specifically, the court had to assess the gravity of the offences, the defendants' culpability, and the factors that could mitigate the sentences under the Sentencing Act 1991 and the Crimes Act 1914. The court needed to balance the deterrent effect of the sentences with the mitigating factors of the guilty pleas and cooperation with authorities.
The court found that the defendants' misuse of their positions as directors was serious, but also acknowledged the mitigating factors of their guilty pleas and cooperation with law enforcement. The court considered these factors in determining the appropriate terms of imprisonment, ultimately deciding on sentences that would reflect the seriousness of the offences while also considering the mitigating circumstances. The defendant Emini was sentenced to 24 months' imprisonment, to be released on recognisance after serving 12 months, while the defendant Blumberg was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment, to be released on recognisance after serving six months.
Orders
Orders of the court
Mr Blumberg, you are convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 12 months commencing today.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.