R v Ellis, Craig Martin

Link copied
Case Copied 39 min read

District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v ELLIS, Craig Martin [2017] NSWDC 318
Hearing dates: 13 and 20 October 2017
Date of orders: 20 October 2017
Decision date: 20 October 2017
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Judge S Norrish QC
Decision:

Full-time custodial sentence. For orders see [83].

Catchwords: CRIMINAL – SENTENCE – two counts of misleading a judicial tribunal – one count relating to the Local Court of NSW and one count relating to the District Court of NSW – offences committed while the General Manager of the Shelley Beach Golf Club – no prior criminal offences – on two separate occasions intentionally concealed CCTV footage requested by police in relation to the prosecution and later civil proceedings launched by a patron who had previously been on the club premises – breach of trust not an aggravating factor – significance of mental health conditions that emerged after the offences – ‘extra-curial’ punishment – strong family support system – minimal discount for utilitarian benefit of plea of guilty on first offence – full discount for second offence – totality of sentence – special circumstances.
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Liquor Act 2007 (NSW)
Crimes (Sentencing and Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
Cases Cited: DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194
Einfeld v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 87
Iskander v R [2013] NSWCCA 235
Kearsley v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 28
Marinellis v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 307
Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610
Phanekham [2015] NSWCCA 295
R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561
R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67
R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540
R v Malicki [2015] NSWCCA 162
R v Thompson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
Regina v Daetz [2003] NSWCCA 216
Regina v Giang [2001] NSWCCA 276
R v Rivkin [2003] NSWSC 447
R v Rivkin [2004] NSWCCA 7
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Craig Martin Ellis (Offender)
Representation: Counsel:
Mr P Barrett (Crown)
Mr T Watts (Counsel)
File Number(s): 2015/00341249
Publication restriction: Nil

SENTENCE

  1. HIS HONOUR: My practice is to tell people in advance what sentence I propose to impose. In your case, Mr Ellis, I propose to impose a total sentence of one year and 10 months' imprisonment. I propose to sentence you to a term of imprisonment that will comprise a non-parole period on my calculation of 10 months. The balance of sentence will be 12 months. Therefore you will be required to spend a minimum of 10 months in prison in relation to the offences to which you have pleaded guilty.

  2. Sir Walter Scott in 1808 in a poem called Marmion wrote, "Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive". This matter involving the two offences to which the prisoner has pleaded guilty demonstrates the wisdom of Sir Walter Scott's observation. This is the case here. Craig Martin Ellis pleaded guilty in this court as I understand it in August 2017 to two charges on the indictment that…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read R v Ellis, Craig Martin and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] NSWDC 318
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Ellis, Craig Martin, the defendant was convicted on two counts of misleading a judicial tribunal. The offences were committed while Ellis was the General Manager of the Shelley Beach Golf Club. The first count related to misleading the Local Court of NSW, and the second count related to misleading the District Court of NSW. The offences arose from Ellis's intentional concealment of CCTV footage requested by police in relation to both the prosecution and subsequent civil proceedings initiated by a former patron of the golf club. Ellis had no prior criminal history.

The court was tasked with determining the appropriate sentence for the offences. Key considerations included the breach of trust, Ellis's mental health conditions that emerged post-offences, his strong family support system, and the utilitarian benefits of his guilty pleas. The court held that the breach of trust did not serve as an aggravating factor. The mental health conditions and the support system were mitigating factors. The court applied a minimal discount for the first offence's guilty plea and a full discount for the second offence.

The court concluded that a full-time custodial sentence was appropriate, considering the totality of the circumstances. Special circumstances, including Ellis's mental health and family support, were taken into account. The court detailed the sentence and specific orders in the judgment.

The court ordered a full-time custodial sentence for Ellis, Craig Martin. The specific orders and details of the sentence are outlined in the court's judgment. The decision underscores the importance of considering both aggravating and mitigating factors, as well as the utility of guilty pleas, in determining an appropriate sentence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full-time custodial sentence. For orders see [83].

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.