CITATION: R v Dudgeon [2008] NSWDC 131 HEARING DATE(S): 10 June 2008
JUDGMENT DATE:
10 June 2008JURISDICTION: Criminal JUDGMENT OF: Bennett SC DCJ DECISION: Imprisonment:
Overall period - 3 years full time custody
Non-parole period - 1 yearCATCHWORDS: CRIME – dangerous driving occasioning death – s 52A (1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – offender driving utility vehicle – impaired by midrange blood alcohol level –excessive speed at night across unfamiliar rough terrain – deceased thrown from rear tray – aggravating and mitigating factors – s 21A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) – assessment of moral culpability LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999CASES CITED: R v Khatter [2000] NSWCCA 32
R v Previtera (1997) 94 A Crim R 76
R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252PARTIES: The Queen
Christopher Daniel DudgeonFILE NUMBER(S): 2008 / 00007099 COUNSEL: Mr T Healey (Offender) SOLICITORS: Mr M Ferguson (Crown)
Turnbull Hill Lawyers (Offender)
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
- 1 -
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1 Christopher Daniel Dudgeon, the offender, reached his thirtieth birthday on 11 March this year. His friend, Timothy Hillis, did not reach the point of being able to celebrate his twenty fourth birthday. In the early hours of 28 January 2007 he died from extensive injuries suffered when he was thrown from the back tray of a 4-wheel drive vehicle, which then rolled over onto him, after the offender was driving it in pursuit of a kangaroo across a paddock in Gunnedah. The offender now faces the certainty of imprisonment and the continuing burden that he will carry for the balance of his life, knowing that he was the reason for the death of his younger friend.
2 This case provides yet another example of the tragic outcome when individuals place themselves and others at risk by driving motor vehicles dangerously and after ingesting excessive quantities of alcohol in the face of the enormous effort by the legislature and the courts to curb this behaviour.
The Proceedings
3 The offender pleaded guilty in the Local Court at Tamworth to dangerous driving causing death, an offence contrary to s 52A (1) (c) of the Crimes Act 1900, for which the maximum penalty provided is imprisonment for ten years. The charge, as expressed in the court attendance notice commencing these proceedings, identifies the offence to have occurred between 11:30 pm on 27 January 2007 and 12:30 am on 28 January 2007 at Gunnedah. The charge is expressed thus:
That Christopher Daniel Dudgeon, between 27 January 2007 and 28 January 2007, at Gunnedah, in the State of New South Wales, did drive a motor vehicle, to wit VMY-165, a white Toyota Landcruiser Table Top 4 x 4, when it was involved in an impact occasioning the death of Timothy Hillis and, at the time of impact, the said Christopher Dudgeon was driving the vehicle in a manner dangerous to another person.
4 In this court the offender adheres to his plea of…
Continue reading R v Dudgeon
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Dudgeon [2008] NSWDC 131
- Case
- [2008] NSWDC 131
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the defendant's actions were reckless and whether they demonstrated a high degree of culpability. It was noted that the defendant was impaired by alcohol and driving at a high speed in unfamiliar and challenging terrain, which were significant aggravating factors. The court also took into account mitigating factors, such as the defendant's otherwise good character and his expression of remorse. Under section 21A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), the court assessed the moral culpability of the defendant and the circumstances of the offence to determine the appropriate sentence.
The court found that the defendant's actions did amount to dangerous driving occasioning death. It was determined that the defendant's impaired state and excessive speed, combined with the challenging terrain and night-time conditions, demonstrated a high degree of recklessness. The court considered the aggravating and mitigating factors and concluded that the appropriate sentence was imprisonment. The defendant was sentenced to a total of three years in full-time custody, with a non-parole period of one year.
Orders
Orders of the court
Imprisonment: Overall period - 3 years full time custody Non-parole period - 1 year
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.