District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dogan [2022] NSWDC 391 Hearing dates: 14 July 2022 Date of orders: 2 September 2022 Decision date: 02 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Mahony SC DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence to be served by way of Intensive Correction Order. For orders see [84].
Catchwords: SENTENCE – stalk/intimidate intend fear physical etc harm (personal) – common assault – detention application – destroy or damage property – use offensive weapon with intent to commit indictable offence.
Legislation Cited: Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Crimes Act 1900
Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41
DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194
Mandranis v R (2021) 289 A Crim R; [2021] NSWCCA 97 260
R v Edelbi (2021) 105 NSWLR 133; [2021] NSWCCA 122
R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111
R v Pullen (2018) 275 A Crim R 509; [2018] NSWCCA 264
R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1
Category: Sentence Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Ulas Dogan (Offender)Representation: M. Romelingh (Crown)
E. Srour (Offender)
File Number(s): 2021/00179695 Publication restriction: Nil.
REMARKS ON SENTENCE
-
The offender who was born on 23 March 1990 is to be sentenced in respect of the following three offences, to which he entered pleas of guilty in the Local Court:
Sequence 7 – use offensive weapon with intent to commit indictable offence pursuant to s 33B(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty prescribed for this offence is 12 years imprisonment.
Sequence 3 – stalk/intimidate/intend fear physical etc harm pursuant to s 13(1) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007. The maximum penalty prescribed for this offence is 5 years imprisonment and/or 50 penalty units.
Sequence 2 – common assault pursuant to s 61 of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty prescribed is two years imprisonment.
There is no standard non-parole period prescribed for any of the three offences.
-
The offender has admitted his guilt and asked to be taken into account three offences on a Form 1 attached to sequence two. The offences are as follows:
Sequence 4 – common assault pursuant to s 61 of the Crimes Act 1900.
Sequence 5 – common assault pursuant to s 61 of the Crimes Act 1900.
Sequence 6 – common assault pursuant to s 61 of the Crimes Act 1900.
-
The offender has also admitted his guilt and asked to be taken into account on sentence the following matter on a Form 1 attached to sequence 7:
Sequence 1 – destroy or damage property pursuant to s 195(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty prescribed for this offence is 5 years imprisonment.
The sentence hearing
-
The sentence hearing took place on 14 July 2022. The Crown Sentence Summary became Exhibit A and it included agreed facts on sentence which may be summarised as follows.
-
The victim was driving his vehicle…
Continue reading R v Dogan
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Dogan [2022] NSWDC 391
- Case
- [2022] NSWDC 391
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the cumulative effect of the charges warranted a sentence of imprisonment and, if so, what form that sentence should take. The court had to consider the seriousness of the offences, the defendant’s criminal history, and the suitability of the defendant for rehabilitation programs such as an Intensive Corrections Order (ICO).
In its reasoning, the court held that the cumulative effect of the charges warranted a custodial sentence. However, considering the defendant's potential for rehabilitation and the availability of an ICO, the court opted for this alternative sentencing option. The court emphasised the importance of deterrence and rehabilitation, as well as the need to protect the community. Consequently, the court decided that an ICO was the most appropriate form of sentence given the circumstances. The court ordered that the aggregate sentence be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order, with specific details and orders outlined in the judgement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Aggregate sentence to be served by way of Intensive Correction Order. For orders see [84].
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.