R v Dixon

Case [2019] NSWDC 585


District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dixon [2019] NSWDC 585
Hearing dates: 6, 20 September 2019
Date of orders: 20 September 2019
Decision date: 20 September 2019
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Grant DCJ
Decision:

The offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of 11 years with a non-parole period of seven years, commencing 1 May 2017. The non-parole period will expire on 30 April 2024 and the head sentence will expire on 30 April 2028.

Catchwords: CRIME — Firearms offences
SENTENCING — Plea of guilty — Timing of Plea
SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Social Deprivation — Bugmy factors
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Firearms Act 1996
Cases Cited: Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37; (2013) 249 CLR 571
Jinnette v R [2012] NSWCCA 217
Laupama v R [2015] NSWCCA 311
Powell v R [2014] NSWCCA 69
R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1
R v Campbell; R v Smith [2019] NSWCCA 1
R v Dib [2003] NSWCCA 117
R v Lambell [2019] NSWDC 78
R v Stambolis [2006] NSWCCA 56
Zhao v R [2016] NSWCCA 179
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Matthew Dixon (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Chatterton (Solicitor Advocate, Crown)
D Stewart (Offender) 

Solicitors:
Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Rose Hill and Associate Solicitors
File Number(s): 2017/00130082

Judgment

INTRODUCTION

  1. Matthew Dixon appears before me for sentence. He has pleaded guilty to the following:

  1. Use offensive weapon with intent to commit indictable offence, contrary to s 33B(1)(a) of the Crimes Act. The maximum penalty is 12 years. There is no standard non-parole period.

  2. Fire a firearm at a dwelling house with disregard for safety, contrary to s 93GA(1) of the Crimes Act. The maximum penalty is 14 years imprisonment, with a standard non-parole period of five years.

  3. Possess shortened firearm without authority, contrary to s 62(1)(b) of the Firearms Act 1996. The maximum penalty is 14 years. There is no standard non-parole period. The firearm that was possessed was a sawn-off shotgun.

  4. A second charge of possess shortened firearm without authority, contrary to s 62(1)(b) of the Firearms Act 1996. The maximum penalty is 14 years. There is no standard non-parole period. This charge relates to a second firearm in possession of the offender, which was a self-loading rifle.

  1. The offender was arrested on 1 May 2017. He has been in custody since that date. From 28 June 2017 until 27 August 2017 the offender served a two month fixed term for an unrelated matter.

  2. The maximum penalty and the standard non-parole period are an important guidepost in the assessment of sentence. A judge should steer by the maximum penalty and standard non-parole period but not aim for it.

PLEA OF GUILTY

  1. The offender entered pleas in relation to the shortened firearms, the subject of counts 4 and 5 on arraignment on 2 February 2018. A trial was set down in relation to counts 1, 2 and 3 on an indictment dated 1 February 2018…

Continue reading R v Dixon

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Dixon [2019] NSWDC 585
Case
[2019] NSWDC 585
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Dixon involved the defendant, Dixon, who was charged with multiple firearms offences. The dispute centred on the appropriate sentence to be imposed after Dixon pleaded guilty to the charges. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland.

The primary legal issues before the court were the timing of Dixon's guilty plea and the relevant factors to be considered in determining the appropriate sentence. The court had to weigh the significance of Dixon's early guilty plea against the severity of the offences and the circumstances surrounding them. Furthermore, the court needed to consider the Bugmy factors, particularly the impact of social deprivation on Dixon's offending behaviour.

The court determined that Dixon's early guilty plea was a mitigating factor, but it did not outweigh the gravity of the firearms offences. The court found that the offences demonstrated a significant breach of public trust and posed a serious risk to community safety. The court also acknowledged the role of social deprivation in Dixon's offending but emphasised that it did not excuse his criminal behaviour. The Supreme Court of Queensland ultimately sentenced Dixon to an aggregate term of 11 years, with a non-parole period of seven years. The non-parole period will expire on 30 April 2024, and the head sentence will expire on 30 April 2028.

Orders

Orders of the court

The offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of 11 years with a non-parole period of seven years, commencing 1 May 2017. The non-parole period will expire on 30 April 2024 and the head sentence will expire on 30 April 2028.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.