CITATION: R v Dennis Wilson [2008] NSWDC 11 HEARING DATE(S): 3/12/07, 4/12/07, 5/12/07 (Trial)
1/2/08, 8/2/08 (Sentence)
JUDGMENT DATE:
8 February 2008JURISDICTION: Criminal JUDGMENT OF: Knox SC DCJ DECISION: The offender is formally convicted.
The offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 16 months imprisonment to date from 1 March 2007, and to expire on 30 June 2008. The balance of the term will be one of 8 months which will expire on 28 February 2009.CATCHWORDS: aggravated enter dwelling house with intent to steal - knowing that a person or persons were in the place where the offence was committed - CCTV footage - History of drug use - Methadone program - Significant criminal history - Substantial degree of planning - No evidence of remorse - Fernando factors LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999CASES CITED: Veen v The Queen (No2) (1988) 164 CLR 465
R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58
Fernando [2002] NSWCCA 28
R v Silva [2002] NSWCCA 332
R v Labrooy [2004] NSWCCA 371
R v Henry & others[1999] NSWCCA 111
R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327
Vu [2006] NSWCCA 188
Regina v Carter [2003] NSWCCA 243PARTIES: Regina
Dennis WilsonFILE NUMBER(S): 07/11/0494 COUNSEL: Crown: Mr P Aitken
Defence: Mr T Edwards
- 18 -
JUDGMENT
Indictment
1 On 5 December 2007 the offender was convicted by a jury following a trial on count one of an indictment which was as follows:
On 23 January 2007 at Potts Point in the State of New South Wales he did enter a dwelling house, namely 17-18 of 18 Springfield Avenue, Potts Point with intent to commit a serious indictment offence therein, namely stealing in circumstances of aggravation, namely knowing that a person or persons were there in the place where the offence was committed.
The maximum penalty for that offence pursuant to s 11(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 is one of fourteen years imprisonment.
2 The trial took place at Sydney in the District Court between 3 and 5 December 2007. It appears that the offender was committed for trial in June 2007. The offender did not give evidence at the trial. He gave evidence on the sentencing proceedings.
Facts
3 In terms of the facts I find that on the basis of the evidence given at the trial and consistently with the jury’s verdict, the following facts to have been established:
4 That four women, being members of the Kitching family, were residents of the Regents Court Hotel, Potts Point at the premises described in the indictment on the evening of 22 to 23 January 2007.
5 At about 5.30am Mrs Firth Kitching was woken. She saw a male person bent over at the doorway of the home in which she had been sleeping with her daughter and granddaughter. Ms Kitching’s mother was in an adjacent room. Ms Kitching recalled that on the previous evening the bathroom window to the unit had been open. Subsequently…
Continue reading R v Dennis Wilson
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Dennis Wilson [2008] NSWDC 11
- Case
- [2008] NSWDC 11
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the CCTV footage was sufficient evidence to convict the defendant and whether the Fernando factors warranted a lengthy sentence. The Fernando factors include the degree of planning, the presence of a weapon, and the level of violence involved. The court had to consider these factors in determining the appropriate sentence.
The court found that the CCTV footage was indeed sufficient evidence to establish the defendant's guilt. Additionally, the court considered the Fernando factors, noting the substantial degree of planning involved in the offence. The court also took into account the defendant's history of drug use, his participation in a methadone program, and the absence of any evidence of remorse. The court concluded that these factors warranted a significant custodial sentence. The offender was formally convicted and sentenced to a non-parole period of 16 months imprisonment, to date from 1 March 2007, and to expire on 30 June 2008. The balance of the term was set at 8 months, expiring on 28 February 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
The offender is formally convicted. The offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 16 months imprisonment to date from 1 March 2007, and to expire on 30 June 2008. The balance of the term will be one of 8 months which will expire on 28 February 2009.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.