R v Dates

Case [2024] NSWDC 628


District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dates [2024] NSWDC 628
Hearing dates: 20/12/24
Date of orders: 20/12/24
Decision date: 20 December 2024
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years 6 months with a NPP of 2 years 6 months (13/12/23-12/6/26).

I find special circumstances.

The indicatives sentences are (taking into account a 25 percent discount):

Seq 7 Intimidate – 1 month

Seq 4 Assault – 2 months

Seq 16 Wounding – 2 years 10 months with NPP 2 years

Seq 14 Breach of AVO – 1 year 2 months.

I recommend that the offender be referred to the Intensive Drug and Alcohol Treatment Program (IDATP) for assessment.

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence – Common assault – Intimidation – Reckless wounding – Contravene AVO

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

Bugmy v The Queen [2013] 249 CLR 571

Cherry v R [2017] NSWCCA 150

Hoskins v R [2021] NSWCCA 169

R v Hamid [2006] 164 A Crim R 179

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
Offender – Kelvin Dates
Representation: Ms Atkinson for Crown
Ms Suters for Offender
File Number(s): 23/452225
Publication restriction: Names anonymised pursuant to s.45 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007

remarks on sentence

  1. Mr Kelvin Dates is for sentence in relation to a number of offences, to which he has pleaded guilty, those offences being as follows. Firstly, the sequence 4 offence of common assault under s 61 of the Crimes Act 1900, maximum penalty for which is two years imprisonment. Secondly, an offence of intimidation under s 13(1) of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 for which the maximum penalty of five years imprisonment. Thirdly, an offence of reckless wounding under s 35(4) of the Crimes Act 1900, which is the sequence 16 offence and carries a maximum penalty of seven years and has a standard non-parole period of three years specified, and fourthly an offence which is the sequence 14 matter, which is to be dealt with on a s 166 certificate, of contravening an Apprehended Domestic Violence Order. The maximum penalty for that offence is two years imprisonment, and of course, in that matter I am subject to the jurisdictional limit that applies in the Local Court.

  2. The maximum penalties and where applicable, standard non-parole period, are important guideposts and I have had regard to those in the sentencing exercise as being important yardsticks.

Plea of guilty

  1. The offender pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity and will be given a 25% discount by reason of the utilitarian value of those pleas of guilty.

Facts

  1. The facts are agreed and in summary are as follows. The offender was born in 1982 and was aged 41 at the time of the offending, while the primary victim LH was born in 2004 and was 19 at the time of…

Continue reading R v Dates

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Dates [2024] NSWDC 628
Case
[2024] NSWDC 628
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Dates involved a defendant charged with multiple offences related to assault, intimidation, and the breach of an AVO. The defendant was convicted and the matter proceeded to sentencing before the relevant court. The central issue before the court was the appropriate sentence for the defendant, considering the nature and severity of the offences committed.

The court had to determine the appropriate aggregate sentence taking into account the various offences committed by the defendant. This involved assessing the seriousness of each offence, the circumstances under which they were committed, and any mitigating factors that might be applicable. The court also considered the need for specific penalties to address the defendant's history of breaching an AVO and the impact of his actions on the victims.

In delivering the sentence, the court found special circumstances that warranted a substantial penalty. The court imposed an aggregate term of imprisonment of three years and six months with a non-parole period of two years and six months. The court took into account a 25 percent discount for the indicative sentences, resulting in specific terms for each offence: one month for intimidation, two months for assault, two years and ten months for wounding with a non-parole period of two years, and one year and two months for breaching the AVO. The court also recommended that the defendant be referred to the Intensive Drug and Alcohol Treatment Program for assessment.

The final orders included a recommendation for the defendant to be assessed for the IDATP and the imposition of an aggregate sentence with the specified non-parole period.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years 6 months with a NPP of 2 years 6 months (13/12/23-12/6/26).

I find special circumstances.

The indicatives sentences are (taking into account a 25 percent discount):

Seq 7 Intimidate – 1 month

Seq 4 Assault – 2 months

Seq 16 Wounding – 2 years 10 months with NPP 2 years

Seq 14 Breach of AVO – 1 year 2 months.

I recommend that the offender be referred to the Intensive Drug and Alcohol Treatment Program (IDATP) for assessment.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.