CITATION: R v CV [2010] NSWDC 36 HEARING DATE(S): 21/01/2010
JUDGMENT DATE:
28 January 2010JURISDICTION: Criminal JUDGMENT OF: Nicholson SC DCJ DECISION: Supply prohibited drug (2009/00047068):
Convicted.
Sentence to a fixed term of 1 year, 4 months and 15 days imprisonment to date from the 16th January 2009 and expire on the 30th May 2010.
Supply prohibited drug (2009/00147423)- sequence 1:
Convicted.
Sentence to a fixed term of 1 year, 9 months and 15 days imprisonment to date from the 16th January 2009 and expire on the 30th October 2010.
Supply prohibited drug (2009/00147423)- sequence 3:
Convicted.
Sentence to a non-parole period of 1 year 11 months and 15 days to date from the 16th July 2009 and expire o the 1st July 2011. Balance of term of 1 year and 8 months to expire on the 28th February 2013.
I take into account the 7 matters on the Form 1. These matters include:
1.Deal proceeds of crime ($1200.00). Sequence 2
2.Deal proceeds of crime ($14,950.00). Sequence 4
3.Possess prohibited weapon (knuckle duster). Sequence 5
4.Possess prohibited drug (2.0g cocaine). Sequence 6
5.Possess prohibited drug (0.2g heroin). Sequence 7
6.Possess prescribed restricted substance (2 tabs alprazolam). Sequence 8
7.Possess prohibited drug (2.0g cannabis). Sequence 9
I order the offender’s release to parole on the 1st July 2011.
Forfeiture Orders:
Pursuant to s.18 (1) of the Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989, cash in the sum of $1200.00 found at Camperdown in silver Ford motor vehicle registration WTL 636 (VIC) on 16th January 2009 be forfeited to the State.
Pursuant to s.18 (1) of the Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989, cash in the sum of $14,950.00 found in premises rented by the respondent at 216/1 Missenden Road Camperdown on 16th January 2009 be forfeited to the State.
Destruction Orders :
I order the destruction of the drugs.
I recommend the offender to enter into a fulltime rehabilitation centre in New South Wales for the first 6 months of parole.CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentencing - Supply prohibited drugs (x3) - methamphetamines - commercial quantity - Form 1 - dealing with proceeds of crime - possess prohibited weapon (knuckleduster) - possess prohibited drugs - supplies constituted actual and deemed supplies - poly-drug dealing - financial gain outstrips cost of maintaining personal drug habit - standard - non-parol period - commercial supply fall below mid-range of seriousness - standard non-parole period does not apply - plea of guilty. LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999CASES CITED: Gladue v The Queen [1999] 1SCR 688 [80]
R v Cuthbert (1967) 2 NSWR 329
R v Rushby [1977] NSWLR 597
R v Hayes [1984] 1 NSWLR 740
R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168PARTIES: Regina
CVFILE NUMBER(S): 2009/11/1174 COUNSEL: Defence: P Boulten SC SOLICITORS: Crown: Mr. N Borosh
JUDGMENT
Portions of these remarks on sentence have been excluded from this report of them for public policy reasons.
1. CV is another example of…
Continue reading R v CV
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v CV [2010] NSWDC 36
- Case
- [2010] NSWDC 36
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the seriousness of the drug supply offences, noting that the quantities involved indicated commercial dealing rather than personal use. The court concluded that while the offences were significant, they did not reach the mid-range of seriousness typically associated with commercial drug supply, thus not warranting the standard non-parole period. The court also considered the offender's possession of a prohibited weapon and various drugs, as well as the proceeds of crime found during the investigation. The plea of guilty was acknowledged, resulting in a reduction in the sentences imposed.
Following a comprehensive analysis of the offences and mitigating factors, the court sentenced the respondent to fixed and non-parole terms for the drug supply charges, with specific dates for the commencement and expiration of each sentence. The court also ordered the forfeiture of cash found during the investigation and mandated the destruction of the drugs. The court recommended that the respondent enter a full-time rehabilitation centre during the initial phase of parole, aiming to address the underlying issues contributing to the criminal behaviour.
Orders
Orders of the court
Supply prohibited drug (2009/00047068):
Convicted.
Sentence to a fixed term of 1 year, 4 months and 15 days imprisonment to date from the 16th January 2009 and expire on the 30th May 2010.
Supply prohibited drug (2009/00147423)- sequence 1:
Convicted.
Sentence to a fixed term of 1 year, 9 months and 15 days imprisonment to date from the 16th January 2009 and expire on the 30th October 2010.
Supply prohibited drug (2009/00147423)- sequence 3:
Convicted.
Sentence to a non-parole period of 1 year 11 months and 15 days to date from the 16th July 2009 and expire o the 1st July 2011. Balance of term of 1 year and 8 months to expire on the 28th February 2013.
I take into account the 7 matters on the Form 1. These matters include:
1.Deal proceeds of crime ($1200.00). Sequence 2
2.Deal proceeds of crime ($14,950.00). Sequence 4
3.Possess prohibited weapon (knuckle duster). Sequence 5
4.Possess prohibited drug (2.0g cocaine). Sequence 6
5.Possess prohibited drug (0.2g heroin). Sequence 7
6.Possess prescribed restricted substance (2 tabs alprazolam). Sequence 8
7.Possess prohibited drug (2.0g cannabis). Sequence 9
I order the offender’s release to parole on the 1st July 2011.
Forfeiture Orders:
Pursuant to s.18 (1) of the Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989, cash in the sum of $1200.00 found at Camperdown in silver Ford motor vehicle registration WTL 636 (VIC) on 16th January 2009 be forfeited to the State.
Pursuant to s.18 (1) of the Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989, cash in the sum of $14,950.00 found in premises rented by the respondent at 216/1 Missenden Road Camperdown on 16th January 2009 be forfeited to the State.
Destruction Orders :
I order the destruction of the drugs.
I recommend the offender to enter into a fulltime rehabilitation centre in New South Wales for the first 6 months of parole.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.