District Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Cook [2021] NSWDC 436 Hearing dates: 25 June 2021 Decision date: 25 June 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Aggregate sentence of 3 years 2 months with a non-parole period of 1 year 9 months.
Catchwords: CRIME- Aggravated Break and Enter & commit serious indictable offence - inflict actual bodily harm - Common assault - Steal motor vehicle - Drive motor vehicle during disqualification period - Dishonestly obtain property by deception
SENTENCING - Relevant factors on sentence – offences committed shortly after release to parole - breach of promise to be of good behaviour - steps taken to break ties with criminal element - is further custody required - early plea
Legislation Cited: Cases Cited: R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383
Category: Sentence Parties: Jesse Noel Cook (the offender)
Director of Public ProsecutionsRepresentation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr D Grippi (for the offender)
McAneny Lawyers (for the offender)
Ms M Hayes (for Director of Public Prosecutions)
File Number(s): 2020/00248950 Publication restriction: Non publication order-the redacted portion of the judgment and exhibit B.
Confidential transcript cannot be published, they are only to be made available to a court for the purposes of these or other legal proceedings and to the parties in this matter
sentence – ex tempore revised
Introduction
-
Jesse Cook, born in 1996. He has spent more than half of the last seven years of his life in custody. He came before me last year appealing a sentencing decision of the Local Court on 6 April 2020. On that day he said, “This is the true me standing before the Court on one last shot at asking for my freedom back”. He told me that with the benefit of courses and the incentive of fatherhood that this time for sure he would not reoffend. I reduced his non‑parole period on appeal to allow him to keep that promise, not just to me and not just to the Court but to his family.
-
He broke that promise. I am not going to punish him today for breaking a promise to me; he is not the first, he will not be the last. Tragically I only ever see the people who break their promises. There are plenty who keep their promises to the Court and I never see them again.
-
Today Cook’s counsel, Mr Grippi, submitted that Cook be given another chance to prove himself. It was argued that taking into account all relevant principles of sentencing, including the paramountcy afforded community protection; I could structure a sentence that would see him released today. That result might avoid the negative consequences of further time in custody. It is abundantly apparent from Cook’s criminal record that time in custody has not prevented his reoffending.
-
Any sentencing exercise, while ultimately about community protection, must take into account a number of other important factors. One is appropriate recognition of the harm done to the…
Continue reading R v Cook
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Cook [2021] NSWDC 436
- Case
- [2021] NSWDC 436
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the appropriate sentence, considering various legal issues. These issues included the nature and severity of the offences, the respondent's criminal history, the timing of the offences in relation to his release on parole, and any mitigating factors that might be applicable. The court also needed to assess whether further custody was necessary to protect the community and to consider the respondent's steps to break ties with his criminal past.
The court found that the respondent's criminal conduct was severe and that his early plea and some efforts to distance himself from his criminal past were mitigating factors. However, the court concluded that the respondent's actions demonstrated a need for significant punishment and deterrence. The court imposed an aggregate sentence of three years and two months, with a non-parole period of one year and nine months. This sentence reflected the gravity of the respondent's crimes and the need to protect the community from further harm.
Orders
Orders of the court
Aggregate sentence of 3 years 2 months with a non-parole period of 1 year 9 months.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.