R v Col

Case [2021] NSWDC 89


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Col [2021] NSWDC 89
Hearing dates: 5 March 2021
Decision date: 25 March 2021
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Mahony SC DCJ
Decision:

Full-time custodial sentence. For orders see [85]

Catchwords:

Fraud; multiple supply prohibited drugs and deal with proceeds of crime offences; aggregate sentence

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985

Cases Cited:

Cahyadi v R (2007) 168 A Crim R 41; [2007] NSWCCA 1

Caristo v R [2011] NSWCCA 7

Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144

Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295; [1997] HCA 26

R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172

White v R [2016] NSWCCA 190

Category:Sentence
Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Ercan Col (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
P Allport

Solicitors:
M Heywood
File Number(s): 19/153203
Publication restriction: Nil

REMARKS ON SENTENCE

  1. The offender is to be sentenced in respect of the following matters to which he has pleaded guilty:

Count 1/Sequence 14 – Dishonestly obtain property by deception pursuant to s 192E(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900.

The maximum penalty for this offence is 10 years imprisonment and there is no Standard Non-Parole Period.

Count 2/Sequence 3 – Supply drugs on an ongoing basis pursuant to s 25A(1) of the Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 (“DMTA”).

The maximum penalty for this offence is 20 years imprisonment and/or a fine of $385,000. There is no Standard Non-Parole Period.

Count 3/Sequence 4 – Supply prohibited drug greater than indictable and less than commercial quantity pursuant to s 25(1) of the DMTA.

The maximum penalty for this offence is 15 years imprisonment and/or a fine of $220,000. There is no Standard Non-Parole Period.

Count 4/Sequence 7 – Knowingly deal with proceeds of crime pursuant to s 193B(2) of the Crimes Act 1900.

The maximum penalty for this offence is 15 years imprisonment. There is no Standard Non-Parole Period.

Count 5/Sequence 8 – Supply prohibited drug greater than large commercial quantity pursuant to s 25(2) of the DMTA.

The maximum penalty for this offence if life imprisonment and/or a fine of $550,000. There is a Standard Non-Parole Period of 15 years imprisonment for this offence.

  1. The offender has asked that the following offence be taken into account on a Form 1 attached to Count 2/Sequence 3, supply prohibited drugs on an ongoing basis:

Sequence 5 – an offence of supply prohibited drugs pursuant to s 25(1) of the DMTA.

The maximum penalty for this offence is 15 years imprisonment and/or a fine of $220,000.

The offender has admitted his guilt in respect of this offence and has asked that it be taken into account on sentence.

  1. The offences occurred between 6 April and 15 May 2019. The offender was arrested on 15 May 2019 and has been in custody on remand since that date.

The sentence hearing

  1. The sentence hearing took place on 5 March 2021. The Crown Sentence Summary…

Continue reading R v Col

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Col [2021] NSWDC 89
Case
[2021] NSWDC 89
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The respondent, Col, was charged with two counts of supplying prohibited drugs, and one count of dealing with the proceeds of crime. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The issue for the court to decide was the appropriate sentence for Col, given the nature and severity of the offences.

The court considered the aggravating and mitigating factors of the case. Aggravating factors included the quantity of drugs involved, the number of offences, and the fact that the drugs were supplied to a person under 18 years of age. Mitigating factors included the respondent's guilty plea and remorse. The court also considered the need for general and specific deterrence.

The court concluded that a full-time custodial sentence was appropriate. The court took into account the cumulative effect of the offences and the need for general deterrence. The court also noted that a non-custodial sentence would not adequately reflect the seriousness of the offences. The court ordered a sentence of imprisonment, with specific details provided in the judgment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full-time custodial sentence. For orders see [85]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.