District Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Chu [2021] NSWDC 328 Hearing dates: 7 May 2021 Decision date: 21 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Buscombe DCJ Decision: Sentenced to a term of 9 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 6 years
Catchwords: CRIME — Drug offences — Supply prohibited drug – Possess prohibited drug
Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) ss 25(1), (2)
Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 166
Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 (NSW)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 21A, 3A
Category: Sentence Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Quoc Toan Chu (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Ms Sawagid (Crown)
Mr Dhanji SC (Offender)
File Number(s): 2020/113017 Publication restriction: Nil
SENTENCE
Introduction
-
The offender, Mr Chu, stands to be sentenced having pleaded guilty to the following offences; that on 15 April 2020 in Yagoona he supplied an amount of prohibited drug, namely 3,322.50 grams of cocaine being an amount which was not less than the large commercial quantity applicable to that prohibited drug. That is an offence under s 25(2) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act and has a maximum penalty of life imprisonment and/or a fine equivalent to 5,000 penalty units and there is an applicable standard non-parole period of 15 years. That charge was sequence 9 of the charge sequences.
-
The second offence is that on 15 April 2020 in Yagoona he supplied a prohibited drug, namely 19.16 grams of 3,4-methylenedioxy-methylmphetamine. That is an offence under s 25(1) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act and has a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment and/or a fine of $200,000 and there is no applicable standard non-parole period. That charge is sequence 15.
-
The third charge is that on 15 April 2020 in Yagoona he supplied an amount of prohibited drug namely 7,418.36 grams of methylamphetamine being an amount which was not less than the large commercial quantity applicable to that prohibited drug. That too is an offence under s 25(2) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act and has a maximum penalty of life imprisonment and/or a fine equivalent to 5,000 penalty units and there is an applicable standard non-parole period of 15 years and that charge is sequence 22.
-
The fourth charge is that on 15 April 2020 in Yagoona the offender supplied an amount of a prohibited drug namely 2,047 grams of gamma butyrolactone, being an amount which was not less than the commercial quantity applicable to that prohibited drug. That is an offence under s 25(2) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act and has a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment and/or a fine equivalent to 4,200 penalty units and there is an applicable standard non-parole period of ten years.
Form 1
-
There are three Form 1s. When sentencing the offender on sequence 9 which is the supply large commercial quantity of cocaine offence, the offender acknowledges his guilt in relation to an offence of deal with property being $10,350 in…
Continue reading R v Chu
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Chu [2021] NSWDC 328
- Case
- [2021] NSWDC 328
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the prosecution had discharged the onus of proving the respondent's guilt in relation to both the supply and possession charges. It examined the testimony of witnesses, the chain of custody for the seized drugs, and the respondent's explanation and defence. The court's task was to determine if the evidence was sufficient to conclude that the respondent was responsible for the prohibited drug activities.
After careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented, the court found the respondent guilty of both the supply and possession charges. The court held that the prosecution had proven its case beyond reasonable doubt. The judge sentenced the respondent to a term of imprisonment of 9 years, with a non-parole period of 6 years. This decision reflected the severity of the drug offences and the need to deter such activities within the community.
Orders
Orders of the court
Sentenced to a term of 9 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 6 years
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.