R v CG

Case [2023] NSWDC 383


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v CG [2023] NSWDC 383
Hearing dates: 8 June 2023
Date of orders: 10 May 2023
Decision date: 10 May 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Buscombe DCJ
Decision:

Impose a Community Correction Order

Catchwords:

CRIME – Child sexual assault – Historical Child Sex Offences – When offender juvenile

CRIME – Child sexual assault – Elapsed time between commission of offence and plea of guilty – Purposes of sentencing

Legislation Cited:

Child Welfare Act 1939 (NSW)

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)

Criminal Records Act 1991 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Bugmy v R (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37

WB v R [2020] NSWCCA 159

Category:Sentence
Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
CG (Offender)
Representation: Counsel:
Mr B Allison (Crown)
Mr Kent (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/00082732
Publication restriction: Statutory non-publication order
Non-publication order in relation to victims

SENTENCE

The Charges

  1. The offender stands to be sentenced having pleaded guilty to the following charges: That between 1 January 1974 and 31 December 1976 at Tregear, he assaulted SG, a female under the age of 16 years, and committed at the time of the assault an act of indecency. That is an offence under the then s.76 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) and has a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment. That offence was count 1 on an indictment the Crown presented against the offender.

  2. There is also an offence that between 1 January 1976 and 30 March 1976 at Tregear the offender assaulted AG, a female under the age of 16 years, and at the time of the assault committed an act of indecency. That too is an offence under the then s.76 of the Crimes Act and at the relevant time carried a maximum penalty of 6 years imprisonment. That offence was count 4 on the indictment.

  3. There is a 3rd offence, being an offence that between 1 January 1976 and 19 August 1976, at Tregear the offender assaulted a male person, namely MG, and committed an act of indecency upon him. That is an offence under the then s 81 of the Crimes Act and at the relevant time had a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment. That offence was count 6 on the indictment.

Form 1 Offences

  1. The offender acknowledges his guilt in relation to a number of other offences which are on 3 Form 1s.

  2. In relation to the Form 1 concerning the offence in count 1, the offender acknowledges his guilt in relation two indecent assaults committed upon SG during the period 1 January 1978 and 1 February 1979 and asks that I take those offences into account when I sentence him on count 1. The offender was between 16 and 17 years of age as at the date of those offences.

  3. In relation to the Form 1 that relates to count 4, the offender acknowledges his guilt in relation to a further indecent assault concerning AG, that occurred between 1…

Continue reading R v CG

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v CG [2023] NSWDC 383
Case
[2023] NSWDC 383
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved a defendant, CG, who had been charged with historical child sex offences. The offences occurred when CG was a juvenile. The case was heard in the relevant court, which will be referred to as the Court. The central issue before the Court was whether to impose a sentence on CG, considering the time elapsed between the commission of the offence and the plea of guilty, and the purposes of sentencing.

The Court had to determine the appropriate sentence for CG, taking into account the delay between the offence and the plea of guilty. The Court also needed to consider the purposes of sentencing, which include general deterrence, specific deterrence, denunciation, and rehabilitation. The Court had to weigh these factors in light of the particular circumstances of the case, including the historical nature of the offence and the juvenile status of the offender at the time of the offence.

In reaching its decision, the Court considered the historical nature of the offence, the time elapsed between the commission of the offence and the plea of guilty, and the purposes of sentencing. The Court found that a community correction order was the most appropriate sentence in the circumstances, as it would allow for the rehabilitation of the offender while also serving the purposes of general and specific deterrence and denunciation. The Court determined that the delay in the plea of guilty was not sufficient to warrant a more severe sentence and that a community correction order would adequately address the purposes of sentencing.

The Court ordered that CG be subject to a community correction order. The terms and conditions of the order were not specified in the text.

Orders

Orders of the court

Impose a Community Correction Order

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.