Police v JOHNS
[2013] SASC 123
Citation 1
…& 275, referred to. R v Cekic, Niemann & Dettman [2014] SADC 133; R v Neimann [2014] SADC 38; R v Lombardi [2013] SASC 61; R v Buhlmann [2013] SASC 123; Saywell v Yiu (1976) 14 SASR 56; R v Barnett [2009] SASC 332; R v Briggs [2014] SASC 62, applied.…
R v Lombardi
[2013] SASC 61
Citation 2
(Para 33)
…provide the public with a high level of protection from the risk inherent in releasing prescribed applicants into the community…[5] …… [4] [2013] SASC 61 [5] [2013] SASC 61 at [13] Special Circumstances In R v Buhlmann ,[6] Sulan J explained that: [6] [2010] SASC 123 at [15]. Section 10A is aimed at persons who…
R v Buhlmann
[2010] SASC 123
Citation 3
(Para 33)
…o the community…[5] …… [4] [2013] SASC 61 [5] [2013] SASC 61 at [13] Special Circumstances In R v Buhlmann ,[6] Sulan J explained that: [6] [2010] SASC 123 at [15]. Section 10A is aimed at persons who create a threat to the police, to public officials, to the community, or to a particular victim. Sulan J found gui…
R v Barnett
[2009] SASC 332
Citation 4
(Para 33)
…e class of prescribed applicant.[15] [10] (1976) 14 SASR 56. [11] [2010] SASC 123 at [24]. [12] [2009] SASC 332. [13] [2009] SASC 332 at [75]-[85]. [14] [2013] SASC 61 [20]-[24] [15] [2013] SASC 61 at [25]…
R v Briggs
[2014] SASC 62
Citation 5
(Para 3)
…In R v Briggs [2014] SASC 62 whilst Sulan J considered the applicant’s personal circumstances generally, the anticipated further time to trial of 12 to 18 months, the less serious nature of the charges the applicant faced, importantly he then concluded that the applicant for bail in that case positively did not p…
R v Cekic, Niemann & Dettmann
[2014] SADC 133
Citation 6
(Para 3)
…utory framework appears to reflect certain important public policy aims, which at the same time restrict the accused’s chances of getting bail. [1] [2014] SADC 133 The Charges…
R v NIEMANN
[2014] SADC 38
Citation 7
(Para 11)
…r Neimann renewed his bail application, and on 14 March 2014 a judge of this court published reasons for refusing the application.[2] [2] R v Neimann [2014] SADC 38…