R v Canberra Contractors Pty Ltd

Case [2016] ACTSC 13


SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

Case Title:

R v Canberra Contractors Pty Ltd

Citation:

[2016] ACTSC 13

Hearing Date(s):

16 December 2015

DecisionDate:

29 January 2016

Before:

Burns J

Decision:

A conviction is recorded and the defendant is fined $82,500.

Catchwords:

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY – Prosecution under s 31(1) of the Work Safety Act 2008 (ACT) – failure to comply with safety protocols – foreseeability – early guilty plea – financial assistance to deceased’s family – remorse – no evidence of systemic failure on the defendant’s part – general deterrence – penalty imposed.

Legislation Cited:

Work Safety Act 2008 (ACT) s 31(1)

Cases Cited:

Inspector James v Terra Civil Pty Ltd [2011] NSWIRComm 31

Inspector Patton and Star Track Express Pty Ltd [2007] NSWIRComm 192
Inspector Peter Newman v Mainland Civil Pty Ltd [2003] NSWIRComm 288

Inspector Andrew Rowe v Roads Maritime Services of New South Wales [2012] NSWIRComm 43

Parties:

The Queen (Crown)

Canberra Contractors Pty Ltd (Defendant)

Representation:

Counsel

Mr A Williamson (Crown)

Mr K Archer (Defendant)

Solicitors

ACT Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)

O’Connor Harris & Co (Defendant)

File Number(s):

SCC 264 of 2014

BURNS J:

  1. The defendant company has pleaded guilty to one offence contrary to s 31 (1) of the Work Safety Act 2008 (ACT) alleging that it, on 12 December 2011, being a person who had a safety duty, failed to comply with that duty and that failure exposed someone, namely Wayne Vickery, to a substantial risk of serious harm and was negligent about whether that failure would expose anyone to a substantial risk of serious harm.

  1. The maximum penalty for this offence as at 12 December 2011, if the offence was committed by a natural person, was a fine of 1000 penalty units, imprisonment for two years or both.  As the defendant is a corporate entity it is only subject to the imposition of a fine.  The maximum penalty that may be imposed is, therefore, a fine of 1000 penalty units which equates to $550,000.

  1. An Agreed Statement of Facts was tendered at the sentence hearing and I do not propose reciting the facts in detail.  It is sufficient to note that the offence relates to a fatal accident where Wayne Vickery, who for convenience I will refer to as the deceased, was struck by a reversing road grader on a site controlled by the defendant in Macgregor in the Australian Capital Territory.  The deceased was a very experienced construction worker who had been employed by the defendant on a full time basis since November 2001.

  1. By December 2011 he was nominally employed as a plant operator but in reality performed the duties of a leading hand which involved being a grade checker and a plant operator.  He was a union representative and also the company's occupational health and safety representative.

  1. The deceased, as I have noted, was fatally injured when struck by a reversing road grader.  The effective cause of the accident was a failure by both the…

Continue reading R v Canberra Contractors Pty Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Canberra Contractors Pty Ltd [2016] ACTSC 13
Case
[2016] ACTSC 13
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Canberra Contractors Pty Ltd involved the prosecution of Canberra Contractors Pty Ltd under section 31(1) of the Work Safety Act 2008 (ACT) due to a failure to comply with safety protocols, which led to a fatal accident. The court had to determine whether the company had breached its duty to ensure the safety of its employees and whether the penalty imposed was appropriate. The defendant had entered an early guilty plea, and there was no evidence of systemic failure on the part of the company, but the court had to consider various mitigating and aggravating factors.

The legal issues before the court included whether the company's actions or omissions had breached occupational health and safety regulations, the foreseeability of the accident, and the appropriate penalty to impose considering the company's remorse, the financial assistance provided to the deceased's family, and the need for general deterrence. The court needed to weigh these factors to determine a penalty that would serve as a deterrent to others in the industry, while also considering the company's level of culpability and the circumstances surrounding the incident.

The court found that while the company had not acted with malice, its failure to comply with safety protocols was a significant breach that led to the foreseeable death of an employee. The court took into account the company's remorse, its provision of financial assistance to the deceased's family, and the lack of evidence of a systemic failure within the company. However, it was ultimately determined that the penalty needed to reflect the seriousness of the breach and the need for deterrence. The court imposed a fine of $82,500, considering the company's early guilty plea and the mitigating factors but also emphasising the importance of general deterrence.

The court recorded a conviction against Canberra Contractors Pty Ltd and ordered a fine of $82,500. This decision underscored the importance of adhering to occupational health and safety regulations and the need for penalties to reflect both the gravity of the breach and the need for deterrence, while also considering the circumstances of each case.

Orders

Orders of the court

A conviction is recorded and the defendant is fined $82,500.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.