R v Campbell (No 2)

Case [2016] ACTSC 368


SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

Case Title:

R v Campbell (No 2)

Citation:

[2016] ACTSC 368

Hearing Date(s):

13 December 2016

DecisionDate:

13 December 2016

Before:

Elkaim J

Decision:

(i)     For the first offence of aggravated robbery (XO 30975/16), the offender is sentenced to a period of imprisonment of 2 years commencing on 4 July 2016 and ending on 3 July 2018.

(ii)    For the second offence of aggravated robbery (CC 4698/16), the offender is sentenced to a period of imprisonment of 2 years commencing on 4 July 2017 and ending on 3 July 2019.

(iii)    For the offence of dishonestly driving a motor vehicle belonging to someone else (CC 3897/16), the offender is sentenced to a period of imprisonment of 6 months commencing on 4 July 2016 and ends on 3 January 2017.

(iv)   I set a non-parole period to expire on 13 December 2017, being a period of 17 months and 10 days.

(v)    I make reparation orders in the sum of $75 in favour of Big Pizza Company Pty Ltd and Domino’s Pizza Enterprises in the sum of $35.

(vi)   Any breaches of good behaviour orders are referred back to the relevant sentencing court.

Catchwords:

CRIMINAL LAW – JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Judgment and Punishment – Sentence – findings of guilt – aggravated robbery – dishonestly drive motor vehicle belonging to someone else – relevant criminal history

Legislation Cited:

Criminal Code 2002 (ACT), ss 45A, 310(b), 318(2)

Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT), ss 6,7,10, 33(1)(za)

Cases Cited:

Barrett v The Queen [2016] ACTCA 38

R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346
R v Hutchison (ACTSC, 4 April 2013, Higgins CJ, unreported)
R v Monaghan (ACTSC, 11 December 2012, Refshauge J, unreported)

Taylor v R [2014] ACTCA 9

Parties:

The Queen (Crown)

Tyler John Campbell (Offender)

Representation:

Counsel

Ms R Christensen (Crown)

Mr M Hassall (Offender)

Solicitors

ACT Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)

Pappas J Attorney (Offender)

File Number:

SCC 209 of 2016

ELKAIM J:

Introduction

  1. On 17 November 2016, following a judge alone trial which had occupied the previous two days, the offender was found guilty of the following offences:

(a)XO 30975/16 – aggravated robbery in contravention of s 310(b) and s 45A of the Criminal Code 2002 (ACT).

(b)CC 4698/16 – aggravated robbery in contravention of s 310(b) and s 45A of the Criminal Code 2002 (ACT).

(c)CC 3897/16 – dishonestly driving a motor vehicle belonging to someone else in contravention of s 318(2) of the Criminal Code 2002 (ACT).

  1. The offender had been tried with a co-offender (Dylan Kane Stacker) who was also convicted of essentially the same offences.

  1. The maximum penalty for each of the above offences is as follows;

(a)For each offence of aggravated robbery, 25 years imprisonment, a fine of $375,000 or both; and

(b)For the offence of dishonestly driving a motor vehicle belonging to someone else, 5 years imprisonment, a fine of $75,000 or both.

  1. In short summary, on 6 December 2015, the offender…

Continue reading R v Campbell (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Campbell (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 368
Case
[2016] ACTSC 368
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Campbell (No 2), the defendant was convicted on three counts: two counts of aggravated robbery and one count of dishonestly driving a motor vehicle belonging to someone else. The matter was heard in the County Court of Victoria. The defendant's criminal history was significant, contributing to the sentencing considerations.

The court was required to decide the appropriate sentences for each offence, taking into account the defendant's previous convictions and the aggravating factors present in the robberies. The court also needed to determine the cumulative sentence and the non-parole period, as well as reparations and good behaviour orders. The defence argued for the lesser severity in sentencing, while the prosecution advocated for a more stringent penalty reflecting the gravity of the crimes.

The County Court Judge sentenced the defendant to 2 years for each count of aggravated robbery, with sentences to run concurrently, and 6 months for the offence of dishonest driving, to run consecutively. The non-parole period was set at 17 months and 10 days, reflecting the cumulative impact of the offences. Additionally, the court made reparation orders to the victims, Big Pizza Company Pty Ltd and Domino’s Pizza Enterprises, and outlined conditions for good behaviour orders.

The court's final orders included specific sentences for each offence, the non-parole period, reparation payments to the victims, and provisions for any breaches of good behaviour orders. The sentences reflect a balanced approach, considering the defendant's criminal history and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation.

Orders

Orders of the court

(i) For the first offence of aggravated robbery (XO 30975/16), the offender is sentenced to a period of imprisonment of 2 years commencing on 4 July 2016 and ending on 3 July 2018.

(ii) For the second offence of aggravated robbery (CC 4698/16), the offender is sentenced to a period of imprisonment of 2 years commencing on 4 July 2017 and ending on 3 July 2019.

(iii) For the offence of dishonestly driving a motor vehicle belonging to someone else (CC 3897/16), the offender is sentenced to a period of imprisonment of 6 months commencing on 4 July 2016 and ends on 3 January 2017.

(iv) I set a non-parole period to expire on 13 December 2017, being a period of 17 months and 10 days.

(v) I make reparation orders in the sum of $75 in favour of Big Pizza Company Pty Ltd and Domino’s Pizza Enterprises in the sum of $35.

(vi) Any breaches of good behaviour orders are referred back to the relevant sentencing court.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.