District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Cadman [2023] NSWDC 661 Hearing dates: 22 November 2023 Date of orders: 22 November 2023 Decision date: 22 November 2023 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Tupman DCJ Decision: 1. Offender is convicted.
2. Offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years with a NPP of 2 years.
3. Two Form 1 offences taken into account.
Catchwords: CRIME – sentence – 6 substantive offences – two Form 1 offences – victim BW – 14 years old – two offences contrary to s66DB(a) Crimes Act – sexually touch child between 10 and 16 – one offence contrary to s66C(3) Crimes Act – sexual intercourse with child between 10 and 16 – victim KD – 13 years old – two offences contrary to s66C(1) Crimes Act – sexual intercourse with child between 10 and 14 – victim TC – three offences contrary to s61KC(a) Crimes Act – sexually touch without consent
OFFENCES – offender 18 – offender met BW through Snapchat – aware of her age – commenced relationship – offending occurred in March and April 2022 – including uncharged acts – KD BW’s friend – also aware of her age – offending occurred in April – including uncharged acts – offender arrested and bail refused 29 April – granted Supreme Court bail on 8 September – victim TC disability support worker engaged to assist offender’s younger half-brother – offending occurred on 10 November whilst on bail
SUBJECTIVE CASE – living in supported accommodation – NDIS package – allocated NDIS worker – no prior criminal record – difficulty at school – smoked cannabis – binge drinking with peers – limited employment – problematic behaviour at home – autistic spectrum disorder with borderline intellectual functioning – deficit in social communication and interactions – reduces moral culpability – limited degree of insight and remorse – well above average risk of sexual reoffending
SENTENCE – less appropriate vehicle for general deterrence – rehabilitation – EAGP scheme – 25% discount – aggregate sentence
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW): ss 53A, 61KC(a), 66C, 66DB(a)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW): ss 3A, 5, 21A
Cases Cited: Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown)
Archer Anderson Cadman (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
P Ye (Offender)
Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown)
Legal Aid NSW (Offender)
File Number(s): 2022/00337780; 2022/00150920; 2022/00123884 Publication restriction: There is to be no publication of any details that might identify or tend to identify the victims.
Judgment
-
The offender is before the Court at Taree for sentence following his pleas of guilty in the Local Court to six separate substantive sexual assault offences involving three victims and two additional offences to be taken into account on a Form 1, which are also sexual assault offences. I will refer to the victims by initials throughout this judgment. All offences are contrary to four separate Crimes Act 1900 (NSW).
-
In relation to the victim BW and case number H89578080, sequence 1…
Continue reading R v Cadman
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Cadman [2023] NSWDC 661
- Case
- [2023] NSWDC 661
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was to determine the appropriate sentence for Cadman, taking into account the gravity of the offences, his background, and the risk of reoffending. Cadman had no prior criminal record, but he had engaged in problematic behaviour at home and school, had smoked cannabis, and had a history of binge drinking with peers. Additionally, Cadman had an autistic spectrum disorder with borderline intellectual functioning, which impacted his moral culpability and his ability to understand the consequences of his actions. The court also had to consider the risk of reoffending, which was assessed as well above average.
The court acknowledged the severity of the offences, noting that they involved multiple victims and significant breaches of trust. However, the court also considered Cadman’s background and the factors that may have contributed to his offending behaviour. The court determined that an aggregate sentence of four years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of two years, was appropriate. The court also took into account two Form 1 offences, which reduced the overall sentence. The court concluded that while the offences were serious, the sentence should focus on rehabilitation and reducing the risk of reoffending.
The court ordered that Cadman be sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of four years, with a non-parole period of two years. The court also noted that two Form 1 offences were taken into account in determining the sentence.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Offender is convicted.
2. Offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years with a NPP of 2 years.
3. Two Form 1 offences taken into account.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.