R v Bond

Case [2009] QDC 28

DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:  R v Bond [2009] QDC 28
PARTIES:  THE QUEEN
v
CHARLIE ANTHONY BOND
(Defendant)
FILE NO/S:  70 of 2008
DIVISION:  Trial
PROCEEDING: 
ORIGINATING 
COURT:  District Court, Cairns
DELIVERED ON:  26 February 2009
DELIVERED AT:  Cairns
HEARING DATE: 
JUDGE:  Everson DCJ
ORDER: 
CATCHWORDS:  CRIMINAL LAW – Sentencing – Parole Release Date
Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 s 160B
COUNSEL:  Mr P Wilson, Solicitor, D.P.P.
Ms T Schwartz, Solicitor, ATSILS
SOLICITORS:  Office of Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for
the Crown
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service for the
defendant

Introduction

  1. On 1 December 2008 the defendant pleaded guilty to five counts of serious assault of a police officer. In respect of each count he was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for six months with each period of imprisonment to be served concurrently.

  2. Following submissions from counsel, a parole eligibility date of 1 May 2009 was fixed pursuant to s 160B of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (“PSA”).

  3. An astute officer of the Department of Corrective Services took issue with the fixing of a parole eligibility date and on 18 February 2009 a hearing took place whereby the sentence was re-opened and ultimately a parole release date of 1 May 2009 was ordered in place of the parole eligibility date fixed at the hearing on 1 December 2008.

  4. In the course of the hearing on 18 February 2009 it became evident that there was considerable confusion as to the correct application of s 160B in the circumstances. I received the benefit of comprehensive written submissions from Mr Wilson of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. Upon making the order on 18 February 2009 I indicated that I would provide written reasons to the parties. These are the written reasons.

    Relevant facts

  5. The five counts of serious assault of a police officer all occurred on 10 July 2007. The defendant has an extensive criminal history. Relevantly, on 20 December 2006 the defendant was convicted of a number of offences and sentenced to three periods of eight months imprisonment and other lesser periods of imprisonment concurrently with a parole eligibility date of 20 February 2007.

  6. Subsequently, on 17 September 2007 the defendant was convicted of one count of entering premises and committing an indictable offence for which he was sentenced to a period of four months imprisonment with a parole eligibility date of 2 November 2007. The four month period of imprisonment would therefore have expired on 17 January 2008. There are no further entries in the defendant’s criminal history.

    Relevant legislation

  7. Section 160B of the PSA relevantly states:-

    “…
    (2) If the offender has a court ordered parole order cancelled under
    the Corrective Services Act 2006, sections 205 or 209 during the
    offender’s period of imprisonment, the court must fix the date the
    offender is eligible for parole.
    (3) If subsection (2) does not apply, the court must fix a date for the

    offender to be released on parole.

    …”

  8. The…

Continue reading R v Bond

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Bond [2009] QDC 28
Case
[2009] QDC 28
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Bond, which was heard in the Queensland Court, involved a defendant with a history of criminal offences who had been convicted of five counts of serious assault of a police officer on 10 July 2007. The defendant was subject to a court-ordered parole order at the time of the commission of the offence, which had been imposed on 20 December 2006. The legal issue at hand was the correct application of section 160B of the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld) ("PSA") to determine whether the court should fix a parole eligibility date or a parole release date for the defendant.

The court had to decide whether the cancellation of the defendant's parole order, which occurred when he was charged with the current offences, fell within the "period of imprisonment" as defined in the PSA. The court considered the definitions provided in the PSA and the Corrective Services Act 2006 (Qld) ("CSA") to understand the meaning of "period of imprisonment" and its implications for the application of section 160B(2) of the PSA.

The court concluded that the term "period of imprisonment" in section 160B(2) of the PSA refers to the period of imprisonment that the offender is subject to at the time of the sentence hearing, including any unrelated sentences of imprisonment still being served, and does not have a retrospective effect. The court found that the defendant's term of imprisonment expired on 17 January 2008, and there was no continuous or unbroken duration of imprisonment from this date. Therefore, section 160B required the court to fix a parole release date pursuant to subsection (3) in the circumstances.

The court ordered the defendant to be released on parole in accordance with the provisions of section 160B(3) of the PSA. The court provided written reasons for its decision to the parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

In the course of the hearing on 18 February 2009 it became evident that there was considerable confusion as to the correct application of s 160B in the circumstances. I received the benefit of comprehensive written submissions from Mr Wilson of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. Upon making the order on 18 February 2009 I indicated that I would provide written reasons to the parties. These are the written reasons. Relevant facts The five counts of serious assault of a police officer all occurred on 10 July 2007. The defendant has an extensive criminal history. Relevantly, on 20 December 2006 the defendant was convicted of a number of offences and sentenced to three periods of eight months imprisonment and other lesser periods of imprisonment concurrently with a parole eligibility date of 20 February 2007. Subsequently, on 17 September 2007 the defendant was convicted of one count of entering premises and committing an indictable offence for which he was sentenced to a period of four months imprisonment with a parole eligibility date of 2 November 2007. The four month period of imprisonment would therefore have expired on 17 January 2008. There are no further entries in the defendant’s criminal history. Relevant legislation Section 160B of the PSA relevantly states:- “… (2) If the offender has a court ordered parole order cancelled under the Corrective Services Act 2006, sections 205 or 209 during the offender’s period of imprisonment, the court must fix the date the offender is eligible for parole. (3) If subsection (2) does not apply, the court must fix a date for the offender to be released on parole. …” The term “period of imprisonment” is defined in s 4 of PSA in the following terms:- “period of imprisonment” means the unbroken duration of imprisonment that an offender is to serve for 2 or more terms of imprisonment, whether – Subsequently in s 4 the expression “term of imprisonment” is defined in the following terms:- “term of imprisonment means the duration of imprisonment imposed for a single offence, and includes the imprisonment an offender is serving, or is liable to serve – The expression “period of imprisonment” is further defined in s 160 of the PSA in the following terms:- “period of imprisonment means the period of imprisonment that includes the term of imprisonment mentioned in section 160A. Note – Period of imprisonment therefore includes the term of imprisonment a court is imposing at the time of sentence.” Section 14(4) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 states that a note in an Act is part of the Act. Section 160A of the PSA states that s 160B applies “if a court is imposing a term of imprisonment on an offender for an offence.” Section 205 of the Corrective Services Act 2006 (“CSA”) allows a parole board to “amend or suspend a parole order if the prisoner subject to the parole order is charged with committing an offence”.[1] [1] S 205(2)(c) Section 209 of the CSA relevantly states:- “(1) A prisoner’s parole order is automatically cancelled if the prisoner is sentenced to another period of imprisonment for an offence committed, in Queensland or elsewhere, during the period of the order. (2) Subsection (1) applies even if the period of the parole order has expired. …” The issue

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

At the time the defendant committed the offences for which he was sentenced on 1 December 2008 he was subject to a court ordered parole order which was imposed by the Cairns Magistrates Court on 20 December 2006. This court ordered parole order was cancelled, I am informed, pursuant to s 205 of the CSA upon him being charged with committing the offences for which he was sentenced on 1 December 2008. The question to be determined is whether this occurred “during the offender’s period of imprisonment” pursuant to 160B(2) of the PSA. If so, the court must fix a parole eligibility date, if not, the court must fix a parole release date pursuant to subsection (3). Conclusion It is clear that the term “period of imprisonment” in s 160B(2) is intended to refer to the period of imprisonment, the subject of the sentence being imposed by the court, at the time of the sentence hearing together with any unrelated sentences of imprisonment still being served and is not intended to have a retrospective effect. The inclusive nature of the definitions set out above has led to some confusion in this regard, however the correct approach is revealed in s 4 of the PSA where the definition refers to “the unbroken duration of imprisonment that an offender is to serve”. The last entry on the defendant’s history, when he was sentenced to four months imprisonment by the Cairns Magistrates Court on 7 September 2007, resulted in a term of imprisonment expiring on 17 January 2008. There was therefore not a continuous or unbroken duration of imprisonment from this date. Section 160B therefore acted prospectively and required the court to fix a parole release date pursuant to subsection (3) in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.