R v Blackburn

Case [2023] NSWDC 1


District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Blackburn [2023] NSWDC 1
Hearing dates: 22 November 2022
Decision date: 03 February 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Colefax SC DCJ
Decision:

Aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years - reparation order in the sum of $314,253.60

Catchwords:

CRIME - SENTENCE - obtain a financial advantage by deception - dishonestly obtain financial advantage by deception from the Commonwealth of Australia

Legislation Cited:

Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 134.2(1)

Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 21B

Category:Sentence
Parties:

Rex (Crown)

Ms Amanda Leigh Blackburn (Offender)
Representation:

Mr Roucek (Crown Prosecutor)

Mr McAullife (Counsel for the offender)
File Number(s): 2020/00355786
Publication restriction: Nil
  1. Amanda Leigh Blackburn, you appear for sentence in relation to two principal offences.

  2. The first principal offence is that, in the approximately 4 and a half years between 25 March 2014 and 3 August 2019, you obtained a financial advantage by deception.

  3. In essence, this involved you, as the practice manager of a physiotherapy practice in St Clair, New South Wales, submitting 2,244 claims to Medicare for 2,579 patient services that were not provided by that practice. The total amount of payments made by the Commonwealth for those false claims to bank accounts to which you had access or control was $127,530.35. This is sequence 1.

  4. The second principal offence is that, in the approximately 18 months between 8 August 2019 and 2 February 2021, you obtained another financial advantage by deception.

  5. In essence, this again involved you, as that practice manager, submitting 1,403 claims to Medicare for 3,438 patient services that were not provided by that practice. The total amount of payments made by the Commonwealth for those false claims to banks accounts to which you had access or control was $186,703.25. This is sequence 2.

  6. The total amount of payments which you received by deception over almost 7 years was $314,253.60.

  7. Sequences 1 and 2 each involves a contravention of s134.2(1) of the Criminal Code 1995(Cth). The maximum penalty for each offence is imprisonment for 10 years and / or (in the case of sequence 1) a maximum fine of $102,000.00 and (in the case of sequence 2) a maximum fine of $126,000.00.

  8. Insofar as sequence 2 is concerned, you have asked me to take into account one matter on a s16BA Schedule, which I have certified. That is a matter of attempting to obtain a financial advantage by deception.

  9. In essence, this matter relates to you, as that practice manager, attempting to obtain payment from Medicare for 383 claims for 880 patient services which had not been provided by that practice. The total amount of these attempted payments was $47,805.22 and related to the period 8 August 2019 to 2 February 2021. This is sequence 3.

  10. Your offending over that lengthy period of time was brought about by you deliberating abusing Medicare’s bulk billing of claims process – a process which is highly reliant on the…

Continue reading R v Blackburn

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Blackburn [2023] NSWDC 1
Case
[2023] NSWDC 1
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of the Commonwealth of Australia versus Blackburn, the defendant faced charges related to obtaining a financial advantage through deception. The case was heard in the relevant court, where the defendant was found guilty of multiple counts of dishonestly obtaining financial advantage by deception from the Commonwealth of Australia. The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of relevant statutes, the determination of the appropriate sentence, and the calculation of any reparations owed.

The court had to decide the appropriate sentence for the defendant, taking into account the seriousness of the offence, the circumstances of the case, and the need to ensure public confidence in the criminal justice system. The court also needed to determine the amount of reparations that the defendant should pay to the Commonwealth, based on the financial losses incurred as a result of the defendant's actions. In doing so, the court considered the relevant statutory provisions and case law, as well as the principles of sentencing and reparation.

The court found that the defendant's actions were of a high degree of premeditation and deceit, and that the financial losses incurred by the Commonwealth were substantial. The court also noted that the defendant had shown no remorse for his actions and had continued to deny his guilt throughout the legal process. Taking all of these factors into account, the court determined that an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years was appropriate, with a non-parole period of 2 years. The court also ordered the defendant to pay a reparation order in the sum of $314,253.60, representing the total amount of financial losses suffered by the Commonwealth as a result of the defendant's actions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years - reparation order in the sum of $314,253.60

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.