R v Berriman

Case [2021] NSWDC 771


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Berriman [2021] NSWDC 771
Hearing dates: 3 September 2021
Date of orders: 6 December 2021
Decision date: 06 December 2021
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Buscombe DCJ
Decision:

Sentence imposed one of an aggregate sentence of 8 years and 6 months imprisonment with an aggregate non-parole period of 5 years and 6 months. The sentence commences on 11 April 2019 and expires on 10 October 2027. The non-parole period expires on 10 October 2024.

Make an Apprehended Domestic Violence Order under s39 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act which commences today 6 December 2021 and expires on 9 October 2029.

Catchwords:

CRIME– Sexual offences – Aggravated sexual assault – Threat to inflict actual bodily harm with offensive weapon or instrument

SENTENCING — Aggravating factors — Use of weapon

SENTENCING – Subjective considerations on sentence – Special circumstances

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 86(2)(b)

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 37(1)

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61KC(a)

Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61J(1)

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 21A

Cases Cited:

DPP v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1

Hall v R [2021] NSWCCA 220

Lawson v R [2018] WSWCCA 215

Moiler v R [2021] NSWCCA 73

Category:Sentence
Parties: Mitchell Berriman (Offender)
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Representation: Counsel:
Crown: Ms Steedman
Defence: Mr Park
File Number(s): 2019/00113994
Publication restriction: Statutory non-publication order regarding the identity of the complainant

SENTENCE

Introduction

  1. Earlier this year the offender stood trial before me, sitting without a jury, on an indictment containing six counts alleging offences against the victim RK. On 3 September 2021 I returned verdicts of guilty on five of those counts, and not guilty on one of the counts, being count 2. The offender stands to be sentenced on the five counts that I found him guilty of, the particulars of which are as follows.

  2. Count 1; the offender on 11 April 2019 at Miller detained RK without her consent with the intention of obtaining an advantage, namely a psychological advantage, and at the time of the detaining, actual bodily harm was occasioned to RK. That is an offence under s 86(2)(b) of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment and there is no applicable standard non-parole period.

  3. Count 3; the offender on 11 April 2019 at Miller intentionally choked RK so as to render her incapable of resistance, and was reckless as to rendering her incapable of resistance. That is an offence under s 37(1) of the Crimes Act and has a maximum penalty of ten years imprisonment, and there is no applicable standard non-parole period.

  4. Count 4; the offender on 11 April 2019 at Miller intentionally sexually touched RK without consent, knowing she was not consenting. That is an offence under s 61KC(a) of the Crimes Act. It has a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment and there is no applicable standard non-parole period.

  5. Count 5; the offender on…

Continue reading R v Berriman

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Berriman [2021] NSWDC 771
Case
[2021] NSWDC 771
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Berriman involved the defendant, Berriman, charged with aggravated sexual assault. The incident occurred when Berriman threatened the victim with a knife, committing the offence of aggravated sexual assault by means of an offensive weapon. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The central issue before the court was the appropriate sentence for the defendant's actions, considering the gravity of the offence and the aggravating factors involved, particularly the use of a weapon. The court also had to consider the subjective circumstances surrounding the offence in determining the appropriate sentence.

The court began by recognising the severity of the offence, noting the defendant's use of a knife as an offensive weapon, which significantly increased the culpability of the crime. The judge acknowledged the subjective circumstances, including the defendant's background and personal circumstances, but emphasised that these factors could only mitigate the sentence to a limited extent. The court ultimately determined that the use of the weapon was a substantial aggravating factor, necessitating a significant custodial sentence. The court imposed a sentence of 8 years and 6 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 5 years and 6 months. The sentence was backdated to 11 April 2019 and is set to expire on 10 October 2027, with the non-parole period expiring on 10 October 2024.

In addition to the custodial sentence, the court made an Apprehended Domestic Violence Order under section 39 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act. This order commenced on 6 December 2021 and is set to expire on 9 October 2029. The order aims to provide protection to the victim from further harm by the defendant.

Orders

Orders of the court

Sentence imposed one of an aggregate sentence of 8 years and 6 months imprisonment with an aggregate non-parole period of 5 years and 6 months. The sentence commences on 11 April 2019 and expires on 10 October 2027. The non-parole period expires on 10 October 2024.

Make an Apprehended Domestic Violence Order under s39 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act which commences today 6 December 2021 and expires on 9 October 2029.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.