District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Barker [2022] NSWDC 259 Hearing dates: 24 February 2022 Decision date: 25 February 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: King SC DCJ Decision: Convicted on each count.
Special circumstances found to restore the statutory ratio between the non-parole period and balance of term.
Indicative sentences of imprisonment:
2020/00356542/001: 4 years + NPP of 3 yrs
2020/00356563/001: 2 years
2020/00356549/001: 1 year
2020/00356549/002: 18 months
2020/00356549/003: 5 months
Aggregate sentence:
Sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 6 years with a non-parole period of 4 years to commence on 22 July 2021 and expiring on 21 July 2025, and a balance of term of 2 years commencing on 22 July 2021 and expiring on 21 July 2027.
The offender is eligible for parole on 21 July 2025.
2020/00356549/003:
Automatic disqualification period of 3 years applies.
I order that the offender pay compensation in the amount of $2511.77 to CGU Insurance
Catchwords: CRIMINAL – sentence – aggravated break, enter and steal in company - assault occasioning actual bodily harm – common assault – police pursuit – drive in manner dangerous – seriousness of offences – subjective matters – extent to which Bugmy & Fernando principles apply - institutionalisation - drug abuse – remorse and contrition - rehabilitation prospects
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Road Transport Act 2013
Cases Cited: Bugmy v R [2013] HCA37
CallaghanvR [2006] NSWCCA 58
RvFernando [2002] NSWCCA 28 at 42
RvHuynh [2003] NSWCCA 239
RvMcVittie [2002] NSWCCA 344
R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2
RvMoffatt [1990] 20 NSWLR 114
Category: Sentence Parties: Regina
Barker, Edward JamesRepresentation: Solicitors:
Crown: Ms I Fay, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, NSW
Defence: Ms L Connell, Legal Aid NSW
File Number(s): 2020/00356549
2020/00356563
Judgment
-
HIS HONOUR: Edward Barker appears for sentence in respect of a number of offences, the first of which is aggravated break, enter and steal in company, contrary to s112(2) of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty provided is 20 years' imprisonment and there is a relevant standard non‑parole period of five years.
-
For the second offence, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, contrary to s59 of the Crimes Act; the maximum penalty is five years' imprisonment.
-
The third offence is common assault, contrary to s61 of the Crimes Act, and the maximum penalty is two years' imprisonment.
-
The fourth offence is police pursuit, not stop, drive dangerously, contrary to s51B(1) of the Crimes Act; and the maximum penalty is three years' imprisonment.
-
The final offence is drive in a manner dangerous, contrary to s117(2) of the Road Transport Act 2013, and the maximum penalty is nine months' imprisonment and/or 20 penalty units. There is an automatic disqualification period of three years with a minimum disqualification period of 12 months.
-
Mr Barker entered pleas of guilty to all the offences on 2 November 2021 at the Central Local…
Continue reading R v Barker
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Barker [2022] NSWDC 259
- Case
- [2022] NSWDC 259
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the aggravating and mitigating factors of the case. Aggravating factors included the seriousness of the offences, the offender's history of drug abuse, and the fact that the offences were committed in the context of a police pursuit. Mitigating factors included the offender's expression of remorse and contrition, the institutionalisation of the offender, and the offender's prospects for rehabilitation. The court also considered the principles of Bugmy and Fernando, which emphasise the importance of taking into account an offender's Indigenous background and any disadvantages they may have faced in determining an appropriate sentence.
After considering all of the evidence and arguments presented, the court determined that the offender was guilty on each count. The court found that special circumstances existed which restored the statutory ratio between the non-parole period and the balance of the term. The court imposed indicative sentences of imprisonment for each offence, taking into account the seriousness of the offences, the offender's history of drug abuse, and the principles of Bugmy and Fernando. The court also ordered that the offender pay compensation to the victim in the amount of $2511.77.
The court sentenced the offender to a term of imprisonment for 6 years with a non-parole period of 4 years to commence on 22 July 2021 and expire on 21 July 2025, and a balance of term of 2 years commencing on 22 July 2021 and expiring on 21 July 2027. The offender is eligible for parole on 21 July 2025. The court also imposed an automatic disqualification period of 3 years for one of the offences, and ordered that the offender pay compensation in the amount of $2511.77 to CGU Insurance.
Orders
Orders of the court
Convicted on each count.
Special circumstances found to restore the statutory ratio between the non-parole period and balance of term.
Indicative sentences of imprisonment:
2020/00356542/001: 4 years + NPP of 3 yrs
2020/00356563/001: 2 years
2020/00356549/001: 1 year
2020/00356549/002: 18 months
2020/00356549/003: 5 months
Aggregate sentence:
Sentenced to a term of imprisonment for 6 years with a non-parole period of 4 years to commence on 22 July 2021 and expiring on 21 July 2025, and a balance of term of 2 years commencing on 22 July 2021 and expiring on 21 July 2027.
The offender is eligible for parole on 21 July 2025.
2020/00356549/003:
Automatic disqualification period of 3 years applies.
I order that the offender pay compensation in the amount of $2511.77 to CGU Insurance
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.