R v As and GB

Case [2013] NSWDC 196


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v AS and GB [2013] NSWDC 196
Hearing dates:3 May 2013, 17 May 2013
Decision date: 23 May 2013
Before: Letherbarrow SC DCJ
Decision:

AS: Sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of four and a half years and an effective nonparole period of 2 years and 3 months

GB: Sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of three years and an effective nonparole period of 18 months

Catchwords: CRIME - Firearms offences - role of offender - relevance of ex police officer - whether mitigating factor - objective seriousness post Muldrock
Legislation Cited: Firearms Act 1996, s51(2A), s65(1)
Weapons Prohibition Act 1998, s7(1)
Crimes Act 1900, s347
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s44(2)
Cases Cited: R v Tauok (1992) 65 ACrimR 387, R v Thompson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383, Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120, Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357, Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610,
Category:Sentence
Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions - Crown
AS - Offender
GB - Offender
Representation: Director of Public Prosecutions
AS: W. Terracini SC with M. Tanevski
GB: A. Djemal
Director of Public Prosecutions
AS:
GB: Zahr & Zahr Lawyers
File Number(s):2011/334708, 2011/334848
Publication restriction:Non publication and suppression order

Judgment

INTRODUCTION

  1. The offender, S, adheres to guilty pleas entered in the Burwood Local Court on 4 December last to two charges under the Firearms Act 1996 (the Act). The first is that, on 25 July 2011, contrary to s 51(2A) of the Act, he knowingly took part in the sale of a prohibited pistol that had not been arranged through a licensed firearms dealer or witnessed by an authorised police officer. The maximum penalty for such an offence is twenty years' imprisonment. The legislation also provides for a standard non-parole period of ten years' imprisonment.

  1. In relation to this offence S has requested that three matters be taken into account on a Form 1, being two charges of sell ammunition without seeing a buyer's licence/permit contrary to s 65(1) of the Act for which the maximum penalty is fifty penalty units and one charge of possess a prohibited weapon without a permit, namely, an extendable baton, contrary to s 7(1) of the Weapons Prohibition Act, for which the maximum penalty is imprisonment for fourteen years.

  1. The second charge to which S adheres to his plea is that on 1 September 2011, contrary to s 51(2A) of the Act, he was accessory before the fact to the sale of a prohibited pistol that had not been arranged through a licensed firearms dealer or witnessed by an authorised police officer. While charged as an accessory before the fact, it is trite this offence carries the same maximum penalty as the first charge, namely twenty years' imprisonment. Also, the legislation provides for the same standard non-parole of ten years: see s 347 of the Crimes Act.

  1. In relation to this…

Continue reading R v As and GB

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v As and GB [2013] NSWDC 196
Case
[2013] NSWDC 196
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v As and GB involved two defendants, As and GB, who were charged with firearms offences. The dispute was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria. The court was tasked with sentencing the defendants on their guilty pleas to firearm possession and ammunition offences, and considering the role each played in the offending.

The legal issues the court needed to decide included the role each defendant played in the offences, the relevance of one defendant’s prior status as an ex-police officer, and whether this factor could be considered as a mitigating factor in sentencing. The court also had to consider the objective seriousness of the offences in light of the precedent set by the High Court in Muldrock.

The court found that As played a more significant role in the offending than GB. Despite As’s previous status as an ex-police officer, the court held that this did not constitute a mitigating factor. The objective seriousness of the offences was assessed, taking into account the potential harm that could have resulted from the possession of the firearms and ammunition. The court concluded that the offences warranted significant penalties, but allowed for some mitigation based on the defendants' guilty pleas and remorse. As was sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of four and a half years with an effective non-parole period of 2 years and 3 months, while GB was sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of three years with an effective non-parole period of 18 months.

Orders

Orders of the court

AS: Sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of four and a half years and an effective nonparole period of 2 years and 3 months

GB: Sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of three years and an effective nonparole period of 18 months

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.