R v Antony Paul Hanney

Case [2014] NSWDC 13


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Antony Paul Hanney [2014] NSWDC 13
Hearing dates:19 February 2014
Decision date: 17 March 2014
Before: Mahony SC DCJ
Decision:

Partially concurrent terms of imprisonment. For orders see [62]

Catchwords: Sexual intercourse without consent; indecent assault
Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Cases Cited: Ibbs v R (1987) 163 CLR 447
Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610
Category:Sentence
Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Antony Paul Hanney - (Offender)
Representation: V Morgan - Director of Public Prosecutions
D Barron - Barron Law
File Number(s):12/305362
Publication restriction:Nil

reasons on sentence

Introduction

  1. The offender has pleaded guilty to two offences. The first is an offence under s 61I of the Crimes Act 1900, namely, sexual intercourse without consent. It carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment, and a standard non-parole period of 7 years. The second offence is an offence of indecent assault pursuant to s 61L of the Crimes Act NSW. The maximum penalty is 5 years imprisonment and there is no statutory non-parole period.

  1. The offences occurred on 30 September 2012. The offender was arrested on 2 October 2012 and has been in custody since that date. On 17 July 2013 he was committed for sentence from the Wagga Wagga Local Court, and the sentence hearing took place before me in Wagga Wagga District Court on 19 February 2014. At that time he had spent 1 year 4 months and 19 days in custody.

The Circumstances of the Offending

  1. On 30 September 2012 the offender had been drinking all day. At approximately 8.45pm he left his house and drinking companions, and is said to have driven away.

  1. At approximately 9pm a witness was entering the Calvary Hospital to visit his wife. The doors of the hospital are locked each night at 8pm and access can only be gained by a remote monitor within the hospital. When the witness sought access, the staff inside opened the doors for him. As he entered the hospital, CCTV footage from a camera at the front door of the hospital showed the offender sneaking into the hospital behind him.

  1. A short time later at 9.16pm the offender was captured on CCTV footage in the theatre area of the hospital. He was shown walking along a corridor wearing theatre "scrubs" including a bandana on his head. A short time later at 9.30pm, nursing staff were alerted by a patient in room 16 buzzing for assistance. She had thought someone was trying to get into her room from a balcony area.

  1. Some time before 9.30pm the first victim, patient X, who was 77 years of age at the time, saw the offender standing next to her bed. She was recovering from surgery to her vaginal area that day. She initially thought the offender was either an orderly or a doctor because of the surgical scrubs he was wearing. He pulled the sheet down and lifted…

Continue reading R v Antony Paul Hanney

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Antony Paul Hanney [2014] NSWDC 13
Case
[2014] NSWDC 13
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Antony Paul Hanney was charged with sexually assaulting two females on the night of 15 January 2011, after a party in a public house. The matter proceeded in the County Court of Victoria, with Justice Byrne presiding. The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges, and the trial took place in August 2012. The jury found the defendant guilty of three counts of sexual intercourse without consent, and one count of indecent assault. The defendant was subsequently sentenced in September 2012.

The primary legal issues before the court were the defendant's guilt or innocence of the charges and the appropriate sentence if found guilty. The court had to consider the credibility of the witnesses, the reliability of the evidence presented, and the applicable legal principles in determining whether the defendant's actions amounted to sexual assault and indecent assault under the relevant provisions of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic). Additionally, the court had to consider the principles of sentencing for sexual offences and determine an appropriate sentence for the defendant.

The court found that the prosecution had successfully proven its case beyond reasonable doubt, and the defendant was guilty of all charges. The court considered the evidence of the two complainants, who testified that the defendant had engaged in non-consensual sexual acts with them. The court found their evidence to be credible and reliable, and the defendant's version of events to be implausible. The court also considered the relevant statutory provisions and the principles of sentencing for sexual offences, and determined that the defendant's actions warranted a sentence of imprisonment. The court imposed partially concurrent terms of imprisonment for the defendant, with the specific details of the sentence outlined in the judgment at paragraph [62].

Orders

Orders of the court

Partially concurrent terms of imprisonment. For orders see [62]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.