R v Alameddine

Case [2023] NSWDC 299


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Alameddine [2023] NSWDC 299
Hearing dates: 20 July 2023
Decision date: 04 August 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: NOMAN SC DCJ
Decision:

1. The offender is convicted on both offences.

2. The indicative sentences, each reduced by 25% to acknowledge the timing of the pleas are: Sequence 2, attempt sexual intercourse, taking into account the further offence on the form 1: 3 years and 4 months imprisonment; Sequence 4, forcible abduction: 3 years imprisonment

3. The sentence imposed is an aggregate sentence of 3 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non–parole period of 1 year and 9 months to date from 28 July 2023 to take into account the 7 days presentence custody. This sentence will expire on 27 January 2027. Eligibility for parole arises on 27 April 2025. This variation to the statutory ratio to 50% gives effect to a finding of special circumstances.

Catchwords:

SENTENCING — Penalties — Imprisonment – attempt sexual intercourse without consent - Forcible abduction of a woman with intent to carnally know – relevant factor – delay – remorse – limited risk of reoffending – family hardship – significant impact to children

Legislation Cited:

Ss.61I; 61L, 61P, 89 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)

Ss.67(1), 67(2) Crimes [Sentencing Procedure] Act 1999 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517

Jackson v R [2023] NSWCCA 121

R v KH [2022] NSWDC 706

R v Heyward [2020] NSWDC 248

Category:Sentence
Parties: R;
Azam Alameddine
Representation: Counsel:
Crown: Mr J Sfinas
Defence: Mr S Buchen SC
File Number(s): 2021/303849
Publication restriction: Non-publication order re complainant’s identity and/or anything that may identify them

JUDGMENT

  1. The offender, Azam Alameddine, appears for sentence after entering pleas of guilty to two offences in the Local Court on 20 October 2022. He adhered to the pleas in this Court.

  2. The offences for sentence are:

  1. Attempt sexual intercourse contrary to ss61I/61P Crimes Act with a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment; and

  2. Forcible abduction of a woman with intent to carnally know her contrary to s.89 Crimes Act with a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment.

  1. Both of these offences are related to the one incident. Arising out of the same incident, the offender asks that a further offence of indecent assault be taken into account on a form 1 when I sentence on the attempted sexual intercourse offence. This offence is contrary to s.61L Crimes Act and if prosecuted separately would be informed by a maximum penalty of 5 years. I have considered the provided facts. I determine that this conduct is appropriate to be placed on a form 1 and I will take it into account in accordance with the guideline judgment. It is a separate sexual act committed close in time to the principal offence and to the same victim. The act is limited in seriousness although the circumstances in which the act occurred are serious. It does not warrant an increase to the sentence otherwise to be imposed…

Continue reading R v Alameddine

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Alameddine [2023] NSWDC 299
Case
[2023] NSWDC 299
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v Alameddine, the offender was found guilty of attempting to have sexual intercourse without consent and forcible abduction with intent to carnally know. The dispute came before the court, which was required to determine the appropriate sentence. The legal issues the court had to decide included the consideration of the relevant factors, such as the delay in the offender’s plea, the offender’s remorse, the limited risk of reoffending, and the family hardship caused by the sentencing. The court needed to balance these factors against the severity of the offences committed.

The court found that the offender’s delay in entering a plea was a significant factor to consider. However, the court also took into account the offender’s remorse and the limited risk of reoffending. Additionally, the court considered the impact of the sentence on the offender’s family, particularly the significant impact on the children. The court found that the offender’s family hardship was a relevant factor in determining the appropriate sentence. The court acknowledged the timing of the pleas by reducing the indicative sentences by 25%.

The sentence imposed by the court was an aggregate sentence of 3 years and 6 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 1 year and 9 months. The court found special circumstances, which resulted in a variation to the statutory ratio to 50%. The sentence took into account the 7 days presentence custody, and the sentence will expire on 27 January 2027. Eligibility for parole arises on 27 April 2025.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The offender is convicted on both offences.

2. The indicative sentences, each reduced by 25% to acknowledge the timing of the pleas are: Sequence 2, attempt sexual intercourse, taking into account the further offence on the form 1: 3 years and 4 months imprisonment; Sequence 4, forcible abduction: 3 years imprisonment

3. The sentence imposed is an aggregate sentence of 3 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non–parole period of 1 year and 9 months to date from 28 July 2023 to take into account the 7 days presentence custody. This sentence will expire on 27 January 2027. Eligibility for parole arises on 27 April 2025. This variation to the statutory ratio to 50% gives effect to a finding of special circumstances.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.