R v AA

Case [2010] NSWDC 233


CITATION: R v AA [2010] NSWDC 233
HEARING DATE(S): 12/08/10, 17/09/10
 
JUDGMENT DATE: 

15 October 2010
JURISDICTION: Crime
JUDGMENT OF: Norrish QC DCJ
DECISION: Attempt traffic commercial quantity border controlled drug - Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 years and 6 months from 12 April 2009 and to expire on 11 October 2014.
Import commercial quantity border controlled drug – Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 8 years and 7 months which consists of a non parole period being 4 years and 9 months to commence on 12 January 2010 and to expire on 11 November 2014.
CATCHWORDS: CRIME - Sentencing - importing a commercial quantity of border controlled drug - attempt traffic commercial quanity border controlled drug.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CASES CITED: R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67
R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228
Cameron v The Queen (2002) 209 CLR 239
R v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383
R v Bugeja [2001] NSWCCA 196
R v Otto (2005) 157 A Crim R 540
R v El Hani [2004] NSWCCA 162
DPP v Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92
R v NP [2003] NSWCCA 195
JMS v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 229
R v Jimmy [2010] NSWCCA 60
R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346
R v Blackburn & Walters [2001] NSWCCA 121
Yardley v Betts (1979) 22 SASR 108
Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610
R v Bernier (1998) 101 A Crim R 444
R v Riddell [2009] NSWCCA 96
R v XX [2009] NSW 115
PARTIES: Regina
AA
FILE NUMBER(S): 2009/00011243
COUNSEL: Mr Y Shariff - Commonwealth Crown
Ms J Ghabrial - Offender

Introduction

1 The prisoner, AA, has pleaded guilty in this court, having previously pleaded guilty at the Local Court, to a charge of importing a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug, namely cocaine, contrary to s.307.1(1) of the Commonwealth Criminal Code “on 1 April 2009 at Mascot” and a further charge of between 2 and 12 April attempting to traffic in a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug, namely cocaine, contrary to s.302.2(1) of the same Code.

2 The maximum penalty for each offence is life imprisonment and/or a fine of $825,000. The prisoner has been in custody since his arrest on 12 April 2009, although he was not charged with the current offences until 14 April 2009.

3 The evidence in this matter, including the statement of facts and the prisoners evidence, establishes that AA is a citizen of Canada, who came to Australia on 17 November 2008 for the sole purpose of “shepherding” importations of cocaine into this country, sent by other persons in Canada.

The Objective Facts

4 The current charges arise out of the fact that on 1 April 2009 an air cargo consignment consisting of four cardboard boxes arrived in Sydney from Canada on an Air Canada flight. The prisoner was described as the “consignee”, with his address details…

Continue reading R v AA

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v AA [2010] NSWDC 233
Case
[2010] NSWDC 233
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of R v AA, the appellant was convicted of two counts: attempting to traffic a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug and importing a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug. The matter was heard and determined in the relevant Australian court. The appellant contested the severity of the sentences imposed, leading to an appeal against the conviction and sentence.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the sentences imposed were excessive in the circumstances of the case. The court was required to consider the gravity of the offences, the appellant's criminal history, and any mitigating factors. Additionally, the court had to assess whether the sentences were disproportionate when compared to other similar cases.

In delivering the judgment, the court thoroughly examined the nature and impact of the crimes committed. It found that while the sentences were severe, they were commensurate with the gravity of the offences and the need to deter similar conduct in the future. The court rejected the appellant's contention that the sentences were excessive, affirming the trial judge's assessment of the appropriate punishment. Consequently, the appeal against sentence was dismissed.

The final orders of the court confirmed the original sentences. The appellant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 years and 6 months for the attempt to traffic, and 8 years and 7 months for the importation, with a non-parole period of 4 years and 9 months for the latter offence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Attempt traffic commercial quantity border controlled drug - Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 years and 6 months from 12 April 2009 and to expire on 11 October 2014.

Import commercial quantity border controlled drug – Convicted: Sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 8 years and 7 months which consists of a non parole period being 4 years and 9 months to commence on 12 January 2010 and to expire on 11 November 2014.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.