Queensland Police Service v Tobane
Case
•
[2010] QDC 222
•28 May 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Queensland Police Service v Tobane [2010] QDC 222
[2010] QDC 222
28 May 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Queensland Police Service v Tobane, the appellant, Tobane, was convicted of obstructing police officers in the execution of their duties under s 448 of the Criminal Code (Qld). The matter came before the Queensland Court of Appeal which was required to consider whether the elements of the offence of obstructing police officers included the requirement of intention to obstruct. The matter was remitted back to the Magistrates Court at Rockhampton for rehearing before a different magistrate.
The court found that the requirement of intention to obstruct was not an element of the offence of obstructing police officers under s 448 of the Criminal Code (Qld). The court found that the objective test for establishing whether an act constituted an obstruction was whether a reasonable police officer would consider the act to be an obstruction. The court found that the trial magistrate erred in requiring proof of intention to obstruct as an element of the offence. The court found that the trial magistrate had applied the incorrect legal test in determining whether Tobane had obstructed police officers.
The appeal was allowed and the decision of the acting magistrate on 26 November 2009 was set aside. The matter was remitted back to the Magistrates Court at Rockhampton for rehearing before a different magistrate.
The court found that the requirement of intention to obstruct was not an element of the offence of obstructing police officers under s 448 of the Criminal Code (Qld). The court found that the objective test for establishing whether an act constituted an obstruction was whether a reasonable police officer would consider the act to be an obstruction. The court found that the trial magistrate erred in requiring proof of intention to obstruct as an element of the offence. The court found that the trial magistrate had applied the incorrect legal test in determining whether Tobane had obstructed police officers.
The appeal was allowed and the decision of the acting magistrate on 26 November 2009 was set aside. The matter was remitted back to the Magistrates Court at Rockhampton for rehearing before a different magistrate.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Criminal Liability
-
Obstruction of Justice
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Queensland Police Service v Ntakarutimana [2012] QDC 139
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Queensland Police Service v Ntakarutimana
[2012] QDC 139
Commissioner of Police v Peneueta (No 1)
[2011] QDC 370
Queensland Police Service v Ntakarutimana
[2012] QDC 139
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
2
Walden v Hensler
[1987] HCA 54
Walden v Hensler
[1987] HCA 54
A Bank & Coleiro
[2011] FamCAFC 157