Queensland Bulk Terminals Pty Ltd

Case [2021] FWCA 2153


[2021] FWCA 2153
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Queensland Bulk Terminals Pty Ltd
(AG2021/4327)

QUEENSLAND BULK TERMINALS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021

Stevedoring industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY

BRISBANE, 19 APRIL 2021

Application for approval of the Queensland Bulk Terminals Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021.

[1] Queensland Bulk Terminals Pty Ltd (the Applicant) applies to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Queensland Bulk Terminals Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] Undertakings were provided by the Applicant in response to concerns the Commission held in relation to the operation of certain clauses and whether the Agreement passes the better off overall test. A copy of the Undertakings is attached as Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:

(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or

(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] The views of each person or organisation the Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings. Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act, a copy of the undertakings will be attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.

[4] I observe that the following provisions of the Agreement may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  Clause 11.2 – Notice of termination by an employee; and

  Clause 20.5 – Public Holiday falling during annual leave.

[5] I note that the Applicant has given an undertaking that the Agreement will be read and interpreted in conjunction with the NES and that where there is an inconsistency between a provision of the Agreement and the NES, and the NES provides a greater benefit, the NES provision will apply to the extent of the inconsistency. On this basis, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES. I also note that by virtue of s. 55 of the Act, an enterprise agreement must not exclude the NES or any provisions of the NES and s. 56 provides that a term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes s. 55.

[6] The Agreement does not contain a flexibility term that is consistent with the requirements in s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] The Agreement does not contain a consultation term that is consistent with the requirements in s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[8] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover that organisation. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[9] I am satisfied, on the basis of information set out in the Form F16 Application for approval of an enterprise agreement, the Form F17 Employer’s declaration in support of an application for approval of the Agreement and responses to requests for further information provided by the Applicant, that each of the requirements of ss. l86, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account ss.186(3) and (3A), and on the basis of the information contained in the Form F17, I am satisfied that the group of employees covered by the Agreement was fairly chosen.

[10] The Agreement is approved in accordance with s.54 of the Act and will operate from 26 April 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 March 2024.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE511133  PR728782>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Queensland Bulk Terminals Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 2153
Case
[2021] FWCA 2153
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Queensland Bulk Terminals Pty Ltd, sought approval of the Queensland Bulk Terminals Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021 from the Fair Work Commission. The agreement sought to establish terms and conditions of employment for certain workers in the company. The applicant argued that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, negotiated in good faith, and that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issue for the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, as defined by the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission had to determine if the agreement was negotiated in good faith, covered a range of employees, and met the other statutory requirements. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement provided for the fair and reasonable resolution of any disputes that may arise between the parties.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement, as it was negotiated in good faith and covered a range of employees. The Commission also found that the agreement met the other statutory requirements, including that it provided for the fair and reasonable resolution of any disputes that may arise between the parties. The Commission approved the enterprise agreement, stating that it provided for the fair and reasonable resolution of any disputes that may arise between the parties.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Queensland Bulk Terminals Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021. The Commission found that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement and met all the statutory requirements. The approval of the agreement ensures that the terms and conditions of employment for certain workers in the company are fair and reasonable.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.