Queensland Building Services Authority v Chandra

Link copied
Case Copied 17 min read
CITATION: Queensland Building Services Authority v Chandra [2010] QCAT 451
PARTIES: Queensland Building Services Authority
v
Suresh Chandra
APPLICATION NUMBER:   OCR083-10  
MATTER TYPE: Occupational regulation matters
HEARING DATE:     5 August 2010
HEARD AT:  Brisbane
DECISION OF: Dr Bridget Cullen Mandikos
DELIVERED ON: 5 August 2010
DELIVERED AT:      Brisbane

ORDERS MADE:

1.    That Mr Suresh Chandra’s licence number A81718 be cancelled;

2.    That Mr Suresh Chandra be disqualified from obtaining a license in the class of Building Surveyor; Assistant Building Surveyor; and/or Building Surveying Technician for a period of not less than two years and three months (2 1/4) years;

3.    That Mr Suresh Chandra pay a penalty to the QBSA in the amount of $12,000.00 within 60-days of this Order; and

4.    That the parties bear their own costs of and   incidental to the proceedings.

CATCHWORDS : 

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS - Decision by Queensland Building Services Authority that private certifier had engaged in “professional misconduct” and “unsatisfactory conduct” in terms of the Building Act 1975 (Qld). Appropriate penalty where extensive previous disciplinary history – license cancelled; 2 ¼-year period of license disqualification; maximum monetary penalty of $12,000.00.

Building Act 1975 (Qld), sections 204(6), 208, 211

Chandra, S. v Queensland Building Services Authority [2008] QCCTB 232

Queensland Building Services Authority v Chandra [2009] QCCTB 203

Barakat v Building Professionals Board [2009] NSWADT 5

Building Professionals Board v Duffy [2008] NSWADT 117

Building Professionals Board v Cotten [2008] NSWADT 118

Building Professionals Board v Boulle [2009] NSWADT 9

Queensland Building Services Authority v Nelson, J. H. [2007] QCCTB 71

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

APPLICANT: 

Queensland Building Services Authority, represented by Ms Mardee Campbell

RESPONDENT:  Mr Suresh Chandra, represented by Mr G.R. Troedson of Porta Lawyers

REASONS FOR DECISION

History of the Matter

  1. This disciplinary proceeding was referred to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (“QCAT”) by the Queensland Building Services Authority (“QBSA”), in its capacity as the industry regulator pursuant to s204(6) of the Building Act 1975 (Qld)(“Building Act”), on 9 April 2010. 

  1. The former Commercial and Consumer Tribunal (“CCT”) upheld the QBSA’s decision that the respondent, Mr Suresh Chandra, in his capacity as a building certifier, engaged in unsatisfactory conduct, within the meaning of that term as contained within Schedule 2 to the Building Act, and that, as a result of such conduct, a penalty should be imposed: Chandra, S. v Queensland Building Services Authority [2008] QCCTB 232 (Chandra 2008). As such, there is no doubt that proper grounds exist pursuant to s208 of the Building Act for the QBSA’s taking of disciplinary action against Mr Chandra, and the proceedings now before QCAT relate to issues of penalty and costs only.  

What Led to the Current findings of Misconduct:

  1. These disciplinary proceedings arise out of a complaint made to the QBSA by Mr Russell and Mrs Claire Bach, in relation to the approval and certification of a swimming pool constructed at their 33 Hipwood Avenue, Coorparoo property.  The QBSA determined (on 15 January 2008), and…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Queensland Building Services Authority v Chandra and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2010] QCAT 451
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Queensland Building Services Authority versus Suresh Chandra, the court examined a decision by the Queensland Building Services Authority (QBSA) to revoke Chandra's license and disqualify him from obtaining a new license for a specified period, along with a monetary penalty. The dispute arose from allegations of professional misconduct and unsatisfactory conduct by Chandra in relation to his role as a private certifier, as defined under the Building Act 1975 (Qld). The QBSA had a history of disciplinary actions against Chandra, culminating in this decision to cancel his license, impose a 2 1/4 year disqualification period, and a maximum penalty of $12,000.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the QBSA's decision was justified and whether the penalties imposed were appropriate given Chandra's extensive disciplinary history. The court had to consider the evidence and arguments presented by both parties regarding the nature and severity of Chandra's misconduct, the impact of his actions on public safety and the integrity of the building industry, and the proportionality of the penalties in light of his past disciplinary record.

After reviewing the evidence and submissions, the court upheld the QBSA's decision. It found that Chandra's actions constituted professional misconduct and unsatisfactory conduct warranting significant penalties. The court emphasised the importance of maintaining high standards in the building industry to protect public safety and upheld the QBSA's authority to impose strict penalties in cases of repeated misconduct. Consequently, the court confirmed the cancellation of Chandra's license, the 2 1/4-year disqualification period, and the monetary penalty, while ordering the parties to bear their own costs of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. That Mr Suresh Chandra’s licence number A81718 be cancelled;

2. That Mr Suresh Chandra be disqualified from obtaining a license in the class of Building Surveyor; Assistant Building Surveyor; and/or Building Surveying Technician for a period of not less than two years and three months (2 1/4) years;

3. That Mr Suresh Chandra pay a penalty to the QBSA in the amount of $12,000.00 within 60-days of this Order; and

4. That the parties bear their own costs of and incidental to the proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.