Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports & Bulk

Case [2017] FWCA 2935


[2017] FWCA 2935
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports & Bulk
(AG2017/1524)

QUBE PORTS PTY LTD PORT OF ADELAIDE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Stevedoring industry

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 30 MAY 2017

Application for approval of the Qube Ports Pty Ltd Port of Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Qube Ports Pty Ltd Port of Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports & Bulk (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] On 3 May 2017 The Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) lodged a Form F18 – Statutory Declaration objecting to the approval of the enterprise agreement. On 10 May 2017 the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) wrote to the Applicant advising that the Agreement lodged with the application documentation had not been signed by at least 1 representative of the employees covered by the Agreement pursuant s.185(2)(a) of the Act and Regulation 2.06A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009. On 12 May 2017 the Applicant’s representative filed an outline of submissions in relation to the issue and requested an opportunity to be heard.

[3] The matter was listed for hearing before me on 25 May 2017 by video-link to Sydney and Adelaide. Ms Millen was granted permission to appear for the Applicant and Ms Doust was granted permission to appear for The Maritime Union of Australia as I was satisfied that granting permission would enable the matter to be dealt with more efficiently, taking into account the complexity of the matter.

[4] The MUA indicated at the hearing that it is their contention that during the course of bargaining for the Agreement there was to be what is referred to by the parties as an establishment clause in the Agreement and that it was omitted from the document that was circulated to employees. However, it was the understanding of the MUA, as a bargaining representative for the Agreement, that such a clause would in fact have been included. It is conceded by the Applicant that the clause was omitted, and to that extent, this is an issue that goes to whether or not there is genuine agreement and on the basis of the submissions made by the parties I have a concern as to whether or not there was genuine agreement.

[5] The parties agree that my concern on that score can be dealt with by way of an undertaking which has been proffered. The undertaking relevantly sets out that Part B of the Agreement will include a new clause 9.0, which is an establishment clause. The submissions from both parties is that if I am to accept this as an undertaking, that would deal with the issue about whether or not there was a genuine agreement, and I agree with those submissions. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[6] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[7] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.

[8] The Maritime Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[9] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 June 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2020.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE424506  PR593301>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports & Bulk [2017] FWCA 2935
Case
[2017] FWCA 2935
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports & Bulk, the applicant sought approval of the Qube Ports Pty Ltd Port of Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2016. The applicant was represented by Counsel, and the matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The dispute involved the terms and conditions of employment for workers at the Port of Adelaide, with the primary concern being whether the agreement met the necessary legal criteria for approval under Australian labour law.

The key legal issues before the court were whether the agreement provided for the prescribed minimum entitlements, whether it was free from prohibited content, and if it had been made in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. Additionally, the court needed to determine whether the agreement was made without any improper conduct or coercion, and if it provided adequate protection for employees' rights and interests.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement met all the legal criteria for approval. The court held that the agreement provided for the minimum entitlements required by law, did not contain any prohibited content, and had been made in compliance with the Act. Furthermore, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement was free from any improper conduct or coercion and provided adequate protection for employees' rights and interests. Consequently, the court approved the Qube Ports Pty Ltd Port of Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2016.

In approving the agreement, the Fair Work Commission issued a certificate that the agreement was suitable for registration under the Fair Work Act 2009. This decision allowed the agreement to be registered and enforceable, providing a clear framework for the terms and conditions of employment for the workers at the Port of Adelaide.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.