Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports

Case [2022] FWCA 624


[2022] FWCA 624

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports

(AG2022/157)

Qube Ports Pty Ltd TT Line Victoria Enterprise Agreement 2020

Stevedoring industry

COMMISSIONER O’NEILL

MELBOURNE, 23 FEBRUARY 2022

Application for approval of the Qube Ports Pty Ltd TT Line Victoria Enterprise Agreement 2020

  1. Qube Ports Pty Ltd has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Qube Ports Pty Ltd TT Line Victoria Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The application was not lodged within 14 days after the Agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.

  1. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·           Clause 20.7 – Termination;

·           Clause 21.2.3 – Redundancy; and

·           Clause 21.3.1 – Redundancy Payments.

However, noting the undertakings given by the Employer, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 March 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE515078  PR738633>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports [2022] FWCA 624
Case
[2022] FWCA 624
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by Qube Ports Pty Ltd, trading as Qube Ports, for approval of the Qube Ports Pty Ltd TT Line Victoria Enterprise Agreement 2020. The dispute centred on whether the proposed enterprise agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission had to consider various aspects, including the process through which the agreement was negotiated and whether it complied with the legal standards for enterprise agreements.

The legal issues addressed by the Commission included whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated, whether it included the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and whether the agreement was certified by a certified agreement registrar. Furthermore, the Commission had to ensure that the agreement did not include any provisions that would undermine the rights of employees or contravene any provisions of the Fair Work Act.

In its decision, the Commission meticulously examined the negotiation process and the content of the agreement. The Commission found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated, contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions, and was properly certified. It also confirmed that the agreement did not include any unlawful provisions and would not disadvantage employees. The Commission concluded that the proposed enterprise agreement was in compliance with the statutory requirements and approved it accordingly. The Commission's approval was based on its determination that the agreement was fair and reasonable and met all the necessary criteria for enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.