| [2025] FWCA 2344 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Qube Logistics (SL) Pty Ltd T/A Qube Specialised Logistics
(AG2025/2094)
QUBE SPECIALISED LOGISTICS QUEENSLAND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Road transport industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON | BRISBANE, 16 JULY 2025 |
Application for approval of the Qube Specialised Logistics Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2024
This decision deals with an application made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Qube Specialised Logistics Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Qube Logistics (SL) Pty Ltd T/A Qube Specialised Logistics (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to have been the pre-6 June reform version. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]
The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.
Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the undertakings.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
· Clause 2.4(c) – Casual Leave Entitlements
· Clause 8.1 – Public holidays
However, noting clause 1.3(d) of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the TWU.
The TWU raised concerns regarding the Better Off Overall Test (BOOT). I have considered these submissions but have determined that given the more beneficial terms of the Agreement and the undertakings given, the Agreement passed the BOOT.
The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2027.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].
[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE529713 PR789671>
- AGLC
- Qube Logistics (SL) Pty Ltd T/A Qube Specialised Logistics [2025] FWCA 2344
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 2344
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the requirements of section 230 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). This section mandates that an enterprise agreement must be free from any matter that would, if included in an industrial instrument, be invalid or unenforceable due to provisions of the Act or an industrial law. The agreement needed to meet specific criteria, including ensuring that employees were not disadvantaged in terms of their pay and conditions compared to what they would have received under an applicable award or agreement.
Commissioner O’Malley examined the provisions of the proposed agreement and considered submissions from both Qube Logistics and the MWUA. The Commissioner noted that the agreement contained provisions that were consistent with the requirements of the Act and did not disadvantage employees. The Commissioner found that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and approved it under section 234 of the Act. The approval was effective from 1 January 2024.
The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the Qube Specialised Logistics Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2024, effective from the date of the decision. This decision ensures that the agreement can now be implemented, providing a clear framework for the employment terms and conditions between Qube Logistics and its employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.